Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (5)

petrnohejl avatar petrnohejl commented on August 23, 2024 1

Hi Dan. I agree, making the old methods deprecated might be confusing. I know it is a breaking change, but on the other hand, refactoring the code in existing projects should be very easy - developers just have to rename 3 methods. Maybe you can promote a version of the library to 1.0.0 to indicate the change in the API.

from androidviewmodel.

DanielNovak avatar DanielNovak commented on August 23, 2024

That's definitely a very good suggestion, and you are absolutely right - the naming isn't consistent. I am thinking how to do it without forcing developers to change their code, but there is probably no other way (I could make the old methods deprecated, but that would be just confusing).

from androidviewmodel.

FrantisekGazo avatar FrantisekGazo commented on August 23, 2024

Good idea, but changing onModelRemoved() to onDestroy() could be confusing, because this method is called when Activity or Fragment is finishing, not every time onDestroy() is called. So this one should stay as is or change to something like onRemove(), in my opinion.

from androidviewmodel.

petrnohejl avatar petrnohejl commented on August 23, 2024

That's a good point, but we are talking about ViewModel.onDestroy() which should be called when the ViewModel itself is being destroyed. The naming convention is consistent, the moment when it is called is a bit different (in relation with Activity/Fragment), but the method is called when the ViewModel is being destroyed (same behavior as Activity/Fragment), so in this matter, it makes sense. It is a similar situation as Activity vs. Fragment - for example Fragment.onCreate() is not called everytime when Activity.onCreate() is called (e.g. creating fragment instances in a view pager when you are swiping). I think it is not about when exactly it is called in the Activity/Fragment lifecycle, but rather in which situation it is called in ViewModel lifecycle.

I understand it might be confusing in relation with Activity/Fragment lifecycle, but still I think that onDestroy() name makes sense. It is just my personal opinion, onRemove() could be also good name, definitely better than onModelRemoved().

from androidviewmodel.

DanielNovak avatar DanielNovak commented on August 23, 2024

Fixed (will be part of 1.0.0 release)

from androidviewmodel.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.