Questions about radon HOT 5 CLOSED

1. Regex allows for pattern exclusion so I believe so.

2. I'm not sure. There's multiple watermarks embedded by Radon so the comment is not the only watermark.

3. This will not be implemented. Sorry :(

from radon.

Thanks for the reply. I have one more question.

I tried to obfuscate some JAR and open it in JD GUI 1.4 (java decompiler) and the result is the same as in the original JAR. I do not know if this is a bug or a JD application that does it so well that it returns to its original form.

from radon.

JD-GUI is by definition: a piece of trash for deobfuscation. I don't think you decompiled an obfuscated class or you had it obfuscated very lightly. (Possibly a big bug I missed, but I doubt it.)

from radon.

Hey! After having had an extremely hard time with ProGuard, I came to this. It'd be great if you could answer couple questions:

1. Does it obfuscate JARs inside a jar?

2. Is it possible to do only flow obfuscation and no name obfuscation?
This is so that reflection calls work.

3. Any performance impact of flow obfuscation?

4. How are the stack traces impacted?
Followup: If I only do flow obfuscation, what is the impact on stacktraces then?

cc: @ItzSomebody

from radon.

1. Nope.

2. Yes.

3. There will probably be a little bit of overhead, but that should speed up as the JIT inlines the methods.

4. Call stack shouldn't be affected.

from radon.