It's hard to say with that snippet; I'd need to know what you think should fail validation that isn't (or vice versa). Could I see the complete schema (paricularly as $ref works differently between different schema versions) and some example data?

from jsonschemafriend.

Thanks for responding so promptly. I guess, I did not explain my problem clearly enough. I am not trying to validate an instance JSON document - I am trying to parse a schema to look for certain features. Here is a more complete version of the schema:

So, I am loading the sub schemas and trying to iterate through them -

Map<URI, Schema> subSchemas = schema.getSubSchemas();
Set uris = subSchemas.keySet();
Iterator itr1 = uris.iterator();
while (itr1.hasNext())
{
......
Schema s = subSchemas.get(key);
..
s.getExplicitTypes().......
}

What I am seeing is that for all the sub schemas below, barring the composite ones - "ResidenceAddress" and "SubjectPropertyAddress" - the getExplicitTypes() call is returning "object" - which is correct, but for the two composite objects the value being returned is null. Am I not using the library correctly? What am I missing?

{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "",
"description": "",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"Application": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Application",
"properties": {
"Borrowers": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Borrowers"
}
}
}
},
"definitions": {
"Borrower": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"ResidenceAddress": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/ResidenceAddress"
}
}
},
"Borrowers": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Borrower"
},
"minItems": 1,
"maxItems": 2
},
"BaseAddress": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"addressLineText": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/String50"
},
"addressUnitIdentifier": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/String50"
},
"cityName": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/String50"
},
"postalCode": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/String50"
}
}
},
"ResidenceAddress": {
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/BaseAddress"
},
{
"properties": {
"stateCode": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/ResidenceStateCodeType"
}
}
}
],
"required": [
"addressLineText",
"cityName",
"postalCode",
"stateCode"
]
},
"SubjectPropertyAddress": {
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/BaseAddress"
},
{
"properties": {
"countyName": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/String50"
},
"stateCode": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/SubjectPropertyStateCodeType"
}
}
}
],
"required": [
"stateCode"
]
},
"String50": {
"type": "string",
"maxLength": 50
},
"ResidenceStateCodeType": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"AA",
"BB"
]
},
"SubjectPropertyStateCodeType": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"CC",
"DD"
]
}
}
}
Thanks again for building this very useful library. Regards.

from jsonschemafriend.

Hi sorry I haven't had time to investigate this yet.

from jsonschemafriend.

from jsonschemafriend.

@gauamg

for all the sub schemas below, barring the composite ones - "ResidenceAddress" and "SubjectPropertyAddress" - the getExplicitTypes() call is returning "object" - which is correct, but for the two composite objects the value being returned is null. Am I not using the library correctly? What am I missing?

You miss the "type": "object" definition in schema.

@jimblackler - issue can be closed

from jsonschemafriend.