Should Copy's arguments be reversed for consistency with io.Copy? about copier HOT 3 CLOSED

I think no one would export all method from package io and copier at the same time with this:

import . "io"
import . "copier"

And even someone are doing like this, he will get compile error!

So of course, no existing code would be break.

from copier.

That's not what I tried to say. I was saying that the destination, source order of parameters would be more idiomatic because of the consistency with io.Copy's parameters.

from copier.

Sorry, I didn't read you comment carefully... ;(

Yes, you are right. it would be a better to change the order.

Just did it hope won't affect any others due to the breaking change ;(

from copier.