pure-ruby grok fails tests about grok HOT 10 CLOSED

I'm confused. You're using an older version of grok with tests from the master branch?

from grok.

I tried removing the gem and reinstalling from source. Unless I'm screwing
something up - which is entirely possible because I'm a novice with ruby- I
can't get tests to pass.
On Oct 12, 2011 5:56 PM, "Jordan Sissel" <
[email protected]>
wrote:

I'm confused. You're using an older version of grok with tests from the
master branch?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#6 (comment)

from grok.

What version of jruby are you using?

from grok.

Sorry, not at my computer right now. I'll send better bug reports. if it's
of any use, I'm using whatever homebrew on osx installed. I just put it in
last week.
On Oct 12, 2011 5:59 PM, "Jordan Sissel" <
[email protected]>
wrote:

What version of jruby are you using?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#6 (comment)

from grok.

No worries about bug report quality, easy to ask for more data. I want grok to work for you :)

from grok.

Ok, so here's what I've got - again, I'm new to ruby - I'm coming from a
python/mercurial world so if you think I'm overlooking something - I
probably am.

Before you go and read the rest of this email, I'm just pulling from
whatever is in github. I'm assuming that the master branch is deployable.
If that's not the case, can you tell me how to checkout and run tests
against the released gem of jls-grok?

So here we go:

http://pastebin.com/xPHZk3mV

That said, I've just realized I don't actually need the grok library
anymore, but I would like to be able to get tests to pass properly.

vic

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jordan Sissel <
[email protected]>wrote:

No worries about bug report quality, easy to ask for more data. I want grok
to work for you :)

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#6 (comment)

from grok.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Victor Ng <
[email protected]>wrote:

Ok, so here's what I've got - again, I'm new to ruby - I'm coming from a
python/mercurial world so if you think I'm overlooking something - I
probably am.

Before you go and read the rest of this email, I'm just pulling from
whatever is in github. I'm assuming that the master branch is deployable.
If that's not the case, can you tell me how to checkout and run tests
against the released gem of jls-grok?

So here we go:

http://pastebin.com/xPHZk3mV

That said, I've just realized I don't actually need the grok library
anymore, but I would like to be able to get tests to pass properly.

If I check out the grok code, master branch, all the tests pass for me.

If you look at what 'make test-pure' does, it invokes "ruby". The 'pure ruby
grok' will only work under Ruby 1.9.2 syntax, which requires JRuby 1.6.x or
Ruby 1.9.2 itself.

It is likely that whatever "ruby" runs is not one of these. Here, I can even
reproduce your error by using the wrong ruby:

% ruby --version
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [x86_64-linux]

% make test-pure
JRUBY_OPTS=--1.9 LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:$PWD/../../"
RUBYLIB="$PWD/../lib" ruby pure-ruby/alltests.rb
Loading tests: pure-ruby/general/captures_test.rb
./pure-ruby/general/captures_test.rb:2:in `require':
/home/jls/projects/grok/ruby/test/../lib/grok-pure.rb:22: undefined (?...)
sequence: /%{ # match '%{' not prefixed with '' (SyntaxError)

But if I use a supported version of ruby, it works (ruby 1.9.2, jruby 1.6.4,
etc)

-Jordan

from grok.

bingo. thanks. i didn't see the 'ruby' in there. flipped it to jruby and
everything is happy. both my failures i posted as bugs are running clean
now.

thanks,
vic

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jordan Sissel <
[email protected]>wrote:

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Victor Ng <
[email protected]>wrote:

Ok, so here's what I've got - again, I'm new to ruby - I'm coming from a
python/mercurial world so if you think I'm overlooking something - I
probably am.

Before you go and read the rest of this email, I'm just pulling from
whatever is in github. I'm assuming that the master branch is
deployable.
If that's not the case, can you tell me how to checkout and run tests
against the released gem of jls-grok?

So here we go:

http://pastebin.com/xPHZk3mV

That said, I've just realized I don't actually need the grok library
anymore, but I would like to be able to get tests to pass properly.

If I check out the grok code, master branch, all the tests pass for me.

If you look at what 'make test-pure' does, it invokes "ruby". The 'pure
ruby
grok' will only work under Ruby 1.9.2 syntax, which requires JRuby 1.6.x or
Ruby 1.9.2 itself.

It is likely that whatever "ruby" runs is not one of these. Here, I can
even
reproduce your error by using the wrong ruby:

% ruby --version
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [x86_64-linux]

% make test-pure
JRUBY_OPTS=--1.9 LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:$PWD/../../"
RUBYLIB="$PWD/../lib" ruby pure-ruby/alltests.rb
Loading tests: pure-ruby/general/captures_test.rb
./pure-ruby/general/captures_test.rb:2:in `require':
/home/jls/projects/grok/ruby/test/../lib/grok-pure.rb:22: undefined (?...)
sequence: /%{ # match '%{' not prefixed with '' (SyntaxError)

But if I use a supported version of ruby, it works (ruby 1.9.2, jruby
1.6.4,
etc)

-Jordan

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#6 (comment)

from grok.

The makefile has ruby hardcoded into it, if you flip it to jruby - things work fine.

from grok.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Victor Ng <
[email protected]>wrote:

bingo. thanks. i didn't see the 'ruby' in there. flipped it to jruby and
everything is happy. both my failures i posted as bugs are running clean
now.

Excellent! Glad things are working for you now :)

-Jordan

from grok.