Lockup on code generation if port name is missing about drawfbp HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks Michael, that's a big help - hope to deliver a new version within the next week...

Cheers

from drawfbp.

Fixed as of v2.22.4 - at least, doesn't lock!

Question for @bergm : should users be forced to enter a port name? Thanks

from drawfbp.

Question for @bergm : should users be forced to enter a port name? Thanks

As of your philosophy of not forcing much at a certain point in time, I would say no. At any point a user might not know the port name (yet). IMO, It would be best (from a useability point of view) to mark a missing port name in an obvious way, so the user has a hard time missing it. Or maybe alert him when he wants to generate code. A further reason for not enforcing it, is that you used it to create flows for all kinds of illustration purposes. And maybe one just doesn't want to show a port name because it's unnecessary detail. All in all I kind of learned to appreciate your stance of not forcibly coupling code and diagram elements in time and space, like most other tools do.

from drawfbp.

Important point! I am now just generating a message if you decide to generate code... If the port name is omitted, I am now also putting a question mark in the port number in the generated code... Thanks, as always!

from drawfbp.