some questions about evaluating the canditate nodules of the luna16_nodule_predictions about kaggle_ndsb2017 HOT 3 OPEN

Hmm. Hi cannot say directly.. I have used model_luna16_full__fs_best.hd5 later and it works ok.
Not that the smallest changes can give big problems..

from kaggle_ndsb2017.

Hello, julian, thank you very much for the night gave me a reply, now I have put this experiment, but have been thinking, hope can do it, it is a great job, do you remember this model evaluating the sensitivity, perhaps can also, I reviewed methods of Luna16 evaluation standard of the game. Later, I selected some nodules with relatively large diameter on subset0 to evaluate, and the sensitivity result could reach about 80%. So I guess whether the detection effect is not good for nodules with small diameter? Just my guess, of course. I only used this model for the test, removed the model of unet segmentation of lung mass and other models,and directly used your model to test and evaluate on Luna 16, without retraining, which will have an impact on the results?Thank you again for your reply。

from kaggle_ndsb2017.

@fulingly I don't konw if you sovled this problem. I also directly use this model to test and evaluate on luna16 without segmentation of lung mass and other models. thanks for your reply

from kaggle_ndsb2017.