Data isn't visualized for small values about jmh-visualizer HOT 5 CLOSED

Ya, thats true i added a rounding since for my benchmarks the decimals were just annoying ;)
Question. Would it make sense in your case to switch to the next lower OutputTimeUnit, like microseconds ?

If not i was thinking about something like when the values are bigger then a certain threshold (lets say 10) then do the rounding otherwise don't.

from jmh-visualizer.

Generally speaking, why round at all? These small differences might be important and people might not have the possibility or the time (a proper benchmark could take days) to redo the benchmark with a different scale.

from jmh-visualizer.

For me the main benefit is of having the visualizer is cutting through the noise and seeing the most important thing as easy as possible by not being distracted by un-important things!
For the scales i worked with so far, decimals were clearly unimportant.
And i understand that the situation is different for you.

Just wanna check if you are aware on changing the unit and if so, what are your reasons!

from jmh-visualizer.

I understand that. But regardless if you want to round I'd recommend rounding to sig figs. Like on the graph 2 sig figs should be sufficient and when hovering over the data 4 are a good choice I think.

To illustrate, here is a small table:

Or in scientific notation (which really illustrates the way of rounding):

There should be methods somewhere in the internet that do that rounding.

from jmh-visualizer.

Along with the 0.5.1 version i disabled rounding for datasets where each score was below a certain threshold. Please give it a try and let me know how you like it!

from jmh-visualizer.