Will OpenSSL 3.1.x be the next step to have an xcframework? about openssl HOT 9 CLOSED

I plan to prepare update to 3.x later this month.

from openssl.

I was able to build for 3.1.1 by substituting darwin-common->module_ldflags from "-bundle" to "-dynamiclib" in Configurations/shared_info.pl

I haven't fully tested it yet, but it does complete the build.

Additionaly, had to update the header files in support/OpenSSLh.h to include the 3.1.1 headers (and remove deprecated, deleted ones) and do the same in the OpenSSL.xcproject - update the include files.

from openssl.

done https://github.com/krzyzanowskim/OpenSSL/blob/main/LICENSE.txt

from openssl.

is it the time already?

from openssl.

Reading from the official site: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/

So I guess from September 3.1.x will be the only supported series :)

from openssl.

@krzyzanowskim thank you for providing timely updates all this time (the latest one just hours ago), but I'd second @ferencIOS's request as OpenSSL 1.1.1 "will no longer be receiving publicly available security fixes" after September 11 which is in almost exactly a month from today. Are there plans to provide updates for the 3.0 or 3.1 series going forward?

from openssl.

That's great, thank you again.

from openssl.

3.1.2 update PR is on #174 if anyone wants to give it a try.
I appreciate confirmation it works or other feedback before I release the version.

It's not tagged so you have to use the branch name.

from openssl.

@krzyzanowskim Thanks for the update! OpenSSL 3.0 changed its license though (cf. https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/migration_guide.html#License-Change); maybe you want to reflect that?

from openssl.