Blynk seamless integration about lass HOT 3 OPEN

Volodymyr Shymanskyy,

It's me, wuulong. Sorry for wait so long time to verify your new version.
As current my understand, Blynk only need to avoid to use yield() when
device type as LinkItONE. This work around should be able to remove, and
others LinkItONE user will not get this trouble.

Personally, I agree that if you get one device and can be maintain this
device in Blynk, that will be perfect. But I can't sent you device because
I don't have more. I will post your request into the group in FB to see if
someone can send you device. Let see if this work first.

10/3, The LASS demo Blynk interface in the Mini Maker Faire Hsinchu. Thanks
your great job to make this possible.

Wuulong
ps: this is the FB group, https://www.facebook.com/groups/1641811569367039/

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Volodymyr Shymanskyy <
[email protected]> wrote:

I see that you include a workaround for Blynk library:

#define ARDUINO 150 // to avoid Blynk library use yield() in function run(), without this. system will crash!

We at Blynk could integrate it into our library, but I need to now if
there is a specific #define that is set only for LinkIt ONE, to detect this
situation.
Also, it would be good for us to get a device sample to do testing on our
side. Whom can we contact regarding this question? Thx.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3.

許武龍 ( wuulong )
專業認證：IBM Certificated Linux Trainer for LPIC, Security
Engineer(TWCERT/CC), JAVA Programmer(SCJP)
Interest: Maker, Embedded System, Robotics

from lass.

I could send one from Denver. Where would it be going?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015, 4:56 PM wuulong [email protected] wrote:

Volodymyr Shymanskyy,

It's me, wuulong. Sorry for wait so long time to verify your new version.
As current my understand, Blynk only need to avoid to use yield() when
device type as LinkItONE. This work around should be able to remove, and
others LinkItONE user will not get this trouble.

Personally, I agree that if you get one device and can be maintain this
device in Blynk, that will be perfect. But I can't sent you device because
I don't have more. I will post your request into the group in FB to see if
someone can send you device. Let see if this work first.

10/3, The LASS demo Blynk interface in the Mini Maker Faire Hsinchu. Thanks
your great job to make this possible.

Wuulong
ps: this is the FB group,
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1641811569367039/

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Volodymyr Shymanskyy <
[email protected]> wrote:

I see that you include a workaround for Blynk library:

#define ARDUINO 150 // to avoid Blynk library use yield() in function
run(), without this. system will crash!

We at Blynk could integrate it into our library, but I need to now if
there is a specific #define that is set only for LinkIt ONE, to detect
this
situation.
Also, it would be good for us to get a device sample to do testing on our
side. Whom can we contact regarding this question? Thx.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3.

許武龍 ( wuulong )
專業認證：IBM Certificated Linux Trainer for LPIC, Security
Engineer(TWCERT/CC), JAVA Programmer(SCJP)
Interest: Maker, Embedded System, Robotics

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment)
.

from lass.

Volodymyr Shymanskyy,

Great news! You got MTK Lab's donation. LinktITONE*1( at least ).
Please provide your delivery information ( Maybe send to

[email protected] )

To make better support to you, I will provide the contact of MTK Lab to
you.

This is my FB, you can add friend if you like.
https://www.facebook.com/wuulong.hsu

I can feel we all thanks your work and hope you can continue to support
LinkItONE.

Best Regards, Wuulong.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:56 AM, wuulong [email protected] wrote:

Volodymyr Shymanskyy,

It's me, wuulong. Sorry for wait so long time to verify your new version.
As current my understand, Blynk only need to avoid to use yield() when
device type as LinkItONE. This work around should be able to remove, and
others LinkItONE user will not get this trouble.

Personally, I agree that if you get one device and can be maintain this
device in Blynk, that will be perfect. But I can't sent you device because
I don't have more. I will post your request into the group in FB to see if
someone can send you device. Let see if this work first.

10/3, The LASS demo Blynk interface in the Mini Maker Faire Hsinchu.
Thanks your great job to make this possible.

Wuulong
ps: this is the FB group,
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1641811569367039/

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Volodymyr Shymanskyy <
[email protected]> wrote:

I see that you include a workaround for Blynk library:

#define ARDUINO 150 // to avoid Blynk library use yield() in function run(), without this. system will crash!

We at Blynk could integrate it into our library, but I need to now if
there is a specific #define that is set only for LinkIt ONE, to detect this
situation.
Also, it would be good for us to get a device sample to do testing on our
side. Whom can we contact regarding this question? Thx.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3.

許武龍 ( wuulong )
專業認證：IBM Certificated Linux Trainer for LPIC, Security
Engineer(TWCERT/CC), JAVA Programmer(SCJP)
Interest: Maker, Embedded System, Robotics

許武龍 ( wuulong )
專業認證：IBM Certificated Linux Trainer for LPIC, Security
Engineer(TWCERT/CC), JAVA Programmer(SCJP)
Interest: Maker, Embedded System, Robotics

from lass.