underscores are not treated as word seperators about s.el HOT 8 CLOSED

(s-lower-camel-case "foo_bar") produces "fooBar" on my machine.

Could you try running the tests?

They contain this one, for instance:

 (defexamples s-lower-camel-case
    (s-lower-camel-case "some words") => "someWords"
    (s-lower-camel-case "dashed-words") => "dashedWords"
    (s-lower-camel-case "under_scored_words") => "underScoredWords")

from s.el.

The tests ran fine. So I poked around a bit & it seems to be scala-mode2's scala-mode that causes it to not work.
I can take (s-lower-camel-case "foo_bar_") and it works differently in python-mode & scala-mode.

With a bit of 'emacs -q' and '(require 's)', it seems that this is the case even in vanilla emacs + s.el

from s.el.

Ah, you're right. It's based on the current syntax definition.

That explains it. Not sure how to solve it, tho.

from s.el.

Well I hacked it, and added '(replace-regexp-in-string "_" " " s)' instead of s in 's-split-words', but I imagine this might break in other places.

Where does the syntax definition factor in to things? I can't tell from looking in s.el or in the docs for split-string

from s.el.

It's in s-split-words, using [:word:], [:lower:] and [:upper:] in
regexp to support all sorts of i18n issues. I guess _ is a word-character
in Scala.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, MrBones118 [email protected]:

Well I hacked it, and added '(replace-regexp-in-string "_" " " s)' instead
of s in 's-split-words', but I imagine this might break in other places.

Where does the syntax definition factor in to things? I can't tell from
looking in s.el or in the docs for split-string

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/53#issuecomment-33371800
.

from s.el.

Very well. I'll close it as an upstream problem. Thanks for the help

from s.el.

Sorry about the lack of a solution.

from s.el.

I ran into the same problem, and found a possible solution, there is (make-syntax-table) and a (with-syntax-table) macro, s.el could have its own syntax table derived from Emacs main syntax table, and wrap its functions with the with-syntax-table macro, making the results independent of the current syntax table:

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Syntax-Table-Functions.html

from s.el.