L2 Dai is not censorship-resistant about optimism-dai-bridge HOT 2 OPEN

As long as the bridge is governance controlled, what's the difference between:

1. Governance removing liquidity from L1Escrow
2. Governance diluting L2DAI by minting an arbitrary amount of DAI
3. Governance burning users' funds (what you brought up here)

In my opinion, there is not too much difference between these after all. The solution is always the same -- removing governance control over the construct. This will be possible to do (and always was planned) once we are done with moving MCD to L2.

from optimism-dai-bridge.

To be fair the point about burning is unique as single addresses can be targeted which is not the case with minting or stealing from everyone. Agree overall this is not a problem though as we will remove governance's ability to access the erc20 dai contract once MCD is deployed. At that point it should only be mint/burn able through the daiJoin contract same as L1.

from optimism-dai-bridge.