Size optimizations about arest HOT 8 CLOSED

Definitely agree on this one. I already manage to reduce the size of the library by using compile-time conditions in the code so we only use what is required. Any suggestion on how to reduce the size even further ?

from arest.

We could optimize some of the HTTP response(s)?

James Mills / prologic

E: [email protected]
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:29 PM, marcoschwartz [email protected]
wrote:

Definitely agree on this one. I already manage to reduce the size of the
library by using compile-time conditions in the code so we only use what is
required. Any suggestion on how to reduce the size even further ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

from arest.

What exactly do you propose concerning HTTP responses ? Returning less data in the JSON container?

from arest.

Yeah I don't think we need to return
id and connected in every response.

In fact we probably don't need to return JSON at all really
just return HTTP Status Codes.

200 OK == Function/Variable successful
400 ERR == Bad Request
etc

cheers
James

James Mills / prologic

E: [email protected]
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:07 AM, marcoschwartz [email protected]
wrote:

What exactly do you propose concerning HTTP responses ? Returning less
data in the JSON container?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

from arest.

I recently managed to push the size of the library down (of 300 bytes) while working on integrating support for Bluetooth LE & also the Arduino Yun. Will push the update in the next days.

from arest.

That's fantastic! Thanks!

cheers
James

James Mills / prologic

E: [email protected]
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:01 AM, marcoschwartz [email protected]
wrote:

I recently managed to push the size of the library down (of 300 bytes)
while working on integrating support for Bluetooth LE & also the Arduino
Yun. Will push the update in the next days.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

from arest.

Hi James, can I close the issue as I reduced the size of the library? Or do you have additional ideas on how to reduce the size?

from arest.

Yeah I think so :)

James Mills / prologic

E: [email protected]
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:48 PM, marcoschwartz [email protected]
wrote:

Hi James, can I close the issue as I reduced the size of the library? Or
do you have additional ideas on how to reduce the size?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

from arest.