Add support for record types about unitverse HOT 8 CLOSED

Ok, well I have an initial cut of the record type support - I didn't do the equality checks yet - I think if I do that I would emit general tests for anything that implements IEquatable<T>. There are examples of the record type generation at https://unitverse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples/RecordTypeInitProperties/ and https://unitverse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples/RecordTypesPrimaryConstructor/. I'd be interested to hear your feedback.

In fact, that is the case in general - if there's anything you think should be supported / configurable etc then please do open an issue 👍

from unitverse.

Sample for IEquatable output is https://unitverse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples/IEquatableTests/ - specifically the ImplementsIEquatable_Complex method

from unitverse.

Closing this now as I think everything is covered 👍

from unitverse.

--> #55

from unitverse.

Im excited to test this extension, but I really need record support. So would be great if added:)

from unitverse.

I was playing around with it this evening - I should have something out this week.

Question - would you expect it to emit tests to check the built-in equality checking? Or would construction and property checking be sufficient?

from unitverse.

The latter. But maybe equality checking is a good idea as we could write custom equality checks. It's not that bad to remove the unneeded code.

from unitverse.

I tried this today, and it failed (got an error, will report that soon). But unfortunately no minimal reproducible example yet

from unitverse.