Static: Mock Module wide Extension Method from Different Module about mockk HOT 9 CLOSED

staticMockk("com.company.module1.ExtensionKt").use {
    every { any<TestObject>().insert() } returns Completable.complete()
}

from mockk.

Note to use class name and not file name:

staticMockk("com.company.module1.FreeFunctionsKt").use {
    every{ getValue() } returns 1
}

from mockk.

Thanks for the quick response, but does this also work for top level functions?
The function in the Example is not inside a class just in a File named: "FreeFunctions.kt"

from mockk.

That's why you need staticMockk, Kotlin builds class FreeFunctionsKt with static methods out of such functions.

from mockk.

Okay thank you very much so far. Did get it working. Is it only possible to mock static functions inside the .use{} closure?

from mockk.

And one more question:
I have an extension Function on the Abstract class io.reactivex.Observable

fun Observable<TestObject>.insert(): Completable {
    return this
                  .map {
                      it.insert()
                  }
                  .ignoreElements()
}

I can't mock this Extension, because its an abstract class. And I cannot create an Object of Observable like

staticMockk("com.company.module1.ExtensionKt").use {
    every { Observable<TestObject>().insert() } returns Completable.complete()
}

Do you have any thoughts on that?

from mockk.

Something like that should be possible

from mockk.

I see, does any only mock this one extension Function of the Object and the rest behaves normally?
Using this Technique gives me undefined Behavior.
I got it compiling with:

staticMockk("com.company.module1.ExtensionsKt").use {
    every {.any<Observable<TestObject>>().insert() } returns Completable.complete()
}

But this seems to interfere with my Observable chain.

from mockk.

Just in case you still have an issue please report it again with stack traces, examples and more details. Closing this one

from mockk.