MudBlazor template is missing unhandled exceptions div about templates HOT 8 CLOSED

I think you guys are discussing two different things.
@MBNSoftware is addressing how to address the specific exception scenario you gave as an example. While @d00lar is simply saying that the basic unhandled exception catch all logic is missing from the template. The issue raised has nothing to do with awaiting a task or not but what happens when an unhandled exception occurs.

The issue was also brought up on the template repo #451

from templates.

Hi everyone, as part of upgrading templates for the upcoming MudBlazor 7.0.0 release, I rebuilt templates from scratch and the error <div> is there. You can find the change in this PR: #465

from templates.

Hello,

Could this "help" ?

https://medium.com/@alexandre.malavasi/why-exceptions-in-async-methods-are-dangerous-in-c-fda7d382b0ff

To summarize, it's mainly because the Task is not (may not be) awaited. Which is potentially understandable if the original method was not a task : the calls to it were not "awaited".

So I would not qualify this as a bug but rather as a bad programming practice (no offence to you, of course).

Regards,
Christophe

from templates.

Yes i known all that
but best practise is best practise
and life is life / sometimes someone can forget something
but still
in default .net template
there is some 'bar' at the bottom of page with reload btn as You probably known
so same thing im expecting in mudblazor template?
in .net6 template of mudblazor WebAssembly it was
but in .net 8 template for 'server side' project there is not - this DIV is missing
with this as i wrote

this is as expected - do You think it should not be there anymore?
regards

from templates.

To be honest, as I feel it's a "bad programming practice", I would not even try to solve this. It would add mess where there's already enough, I think.

Don't get me wrong, though, I understand your need to handle such exception in a task. But, as many sources seem to agree, the correct way to handle it properly is to await the call. Period.
I'm not skilled enough to go against that, hence my advice to (try to) stay with good practice. Again, no offence but pure common sense or pragmatism,

Regards,
Christophe

from templates.

so You guys think that default blazor option for handling unhandled exceptions - 'Down bar showing that some error occured and You can try reload'
is not needed anymore? but it was needes sometimes ago..? in mudblazor older / webassembly template? from witch version this concept is abbanden?

from templates.

exacly - it is just example nothing more.
also it just 'freaze app' when this div is missing so if some unaware developer will hit this kind of error - he can wait even hour or two waiting for task to compleat seeing no error or no sign of something bad happened.

from templates.

Transferred the issue to MudBlazor/Templates repo

from templates.