Read `name` from object in schema about lighthouse HOT 3 CLOSED

I agree, no point declaring the name twice.

from lighthouse.

I believe the original thought behind it was that the name in the schema file would be the name of the field, while the name in the class would be the name of the GraphQL Type.

However, I do agree that automating this would make the schema file much cleaner. We could make the name optional in the schema (like your example) and default to the (camel-cased) name from the class instance. I actually did something like this in the Connection Registrar (which is a bit of a mess at the moment).

I'll try to get this going later today. I don't think it requires much work, just some defaults in the method signatures and then check if you only have a namespace when registering. Thanks @hailwood!

from lighthouse.

v2.0 uses schema files so no need to register with names anymore!

from lighthouse.