TSC Agenda 2022-01-18 about tsc HOT 4 CLOSED

Proposal: Discuss splitting sigs

We would like to discuss the process for splitting a sig, in particular this some parts of sig-core and sig-content. We would like to split some features out of sig-core and sig-content into sig-simulation and would like to know how to move this forward.

Example: sig-simulation is proposed to combine physics, animation, ai (pathfinding), maths and animation

All features except animation are in sig-core, animation is in sig-content.

This was previously discussed in a sig-core meeting here - o3de/sig-core#13 with broad consensus that sig-core should be split. As a member of sig-content I'm also aware this sig could benefit from being slimmed down slightly.

For attention of @amzn-jillich, @greerdv, @moraaar and @SergeyAMZN.

Adding @amzn-pratikpa for visibility as the chair of sig-core and @monroegm as the chair of sig-content (I think chair is the right term sorry 😝).

from tsc.

Deprecation policy proposed by @hultonha for sig-release: link

from tsc.

o3de/o3de#6703 Continued discussion of the feature grid

from tsc.

Followup regarding 3p integration requirements if needed (with @lawsonamzn )

from tsc.