turbsim Generate experimental wind conditions about openfast HOT 5 CLOSED

Dear @lingajiang,

I agree that the TIMESR feature of TurbSim can only be used to derive full-field turbulent wind fields by time-matching the wind velocity time series measured at one point. The ability to time-match from multiple point measurements is a reasonable enhancement of TurbSim to propose.

That said, DTU has released their PyConTurb code, which is similar to the TIMESR feature of TurbSim, but does support time-matching from multiple point measurements. We have used PyConTurb at NREL when we want to do that.

In your case, however, it sounds like you have data at a very fine spatial resolution of point measurements (considering that we typically recommend using a spatial discretization equal to the maximum chordlength of a blade), so, I'm not sure why you would need to add finer resolution of turbulence at all. (Perhaps you need finer discretization in time?) Instead, I would suggest that you simply convert your data into TurbSim format for use within OpenFAST. While I have not used this script myself, there is a Python script in the OpenFAST Toolbox that can read and write TurbSim binary formatted output files: https://github.com/OpenFAST/openfast_toolbox/blob/main/openfast_toolbox/io/turbsim_file.py. This file format is described in Annex D of the TurbSim User's Guide: https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/main/_downloads/cb14d3e2d3533d76e405d730fea19846/TurbSim_v2.00.pdf.

Best regards,

from openfast.

Just to clarify, the TimeSR feature of TurbSim can already match more than one time history:

See an example input file here: https://github.com/OpenFAST/openfast/blob/main/docs/source/user/turbsim/examples/TurbSim_User.timeSeriesInput

But, as Jason said, if you already have measurements at all the (regularly spaced) points and don't need interpolation, you could just transform your measurements to the .wnd or .bts format that InflowWind can read, or you could read your own data format by modifying the InflowWind UserWind module.

from openfast.

Dear Jonkman
Please forgive me for not having enough ability to write code before, so combined with your suggestion: I wrote my data into a new.bts file through turbsim_file.py for FAST operation. I used visual studion2019 to compile and then run the fast program, do I still need to compile in python according to your suggestion? In addition, I found that you have written the file readfile_bts.m before, if you use readfile_bts.m to add the data to form a new.bts file, is it OK?

Thank you for your reply

from openfast.

Dear @lingajiang,

You don't need to compile Python. It sounds like you already successfully wrote a TurbSim binary file that can be used by OpenFAST.

From the MATLAB Toolbox, I did not personally develop readfile_BTS.m, but this script will read a TurbSim binary file into the MATLAB workspace. I'm not aware that an equivalent MATLAB-based script to write a TurbSim binary file has been developed, but I'm sure that would be possible using readfile_BTS.m as a starting point.

Best regards,

from openfast.

Dear Jonkman
Thank you for your reply
best wish for you.

from openfast.