Make sure examples for 0.1 are valid or removed about geoparquet HOT 7 CLOSED

I can get the files updated.

from geoparquet.

At the moment, I think it is still a "valid" file. We didn't make incompatible changes to the spec up to now (and the file was already using WKT2 for the crs, and WKB for the geometries, it is only missing some optional fields).

from geoparquet.

Yep, I think that's right.

I'll wait for #21 to add the bounding box. We might want to include a second example that includes some of the complications raised there.

from geoparquet.

Yes, in general we will want a set of "reference test files" with various cases, I think.

from geoparquet.

Oh great, we talked through so much that I figured something must have changed, but I guess we mostly reiterated all that we had.

I'll leave this open just to be a final check before releasing 0.1.

from geoparquet.

@TomAugspurger #21 merged, you can go ahead 💪

from geoparquet.

Closed by #24. #27 is still open, but the example should be compatible with that.

from geoparquet.