[PRE REVIEW]: `repytah`: An Open-Source Python Package That Builds Aligned Hierarchies for Sequential Data Streams about joss-reviews HOT 35 CLOSED

@danielskatz I think this is a COI for me - @kmkinnaird and I collaborate pretty regularly. (Hi! 👋)

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.19 s (394.2 files/s, 204746.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      11           4448           4376          16488
Python                          15            987           1466           2455
HTML                             8           1023             24           1843
CSS                              3            194             32            776
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           2112            659
Markdown                         6            120              0            281
YAML                             4             15              6            255
reStructuredText                16            201            310            126
SVG                              1              0              0             86
TeX                              1             12              0             85
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            74           7012           8334          23092
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 987

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.03326 is OK
- 10.1109/MSP.2018.2875349 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-7b98e3ed-003 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

👋 @bmcfee - I see you are acknowledged in this submission. However, I can't tell if that means you are conflicted with it and can't edit it, or if you could be an editor. Can you let me know what you think?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor

In case there's no conflict - if there is, I'll look for anther editor

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

👋 @kmkinnaird - thanks for your submission. As you can see, the first step is finding an editor, which I will work on today, then I'll be out of touch next week before I will be able to come back to it, if needed.

from joss-reviews.

👋 @fabian-s - do you think you could edit this submission?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot invite @fabian-s as editor

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

sorry @danielskatz this is too far from my expertise -- I don't code in Python and know nothing about streaming data.

from joss-reviews.

Thanks all for getting this started! I looked through the list of people who have volunteered to review for JOSS and would like to offer the below list as some possible suggestions for reviewing. The list is ordered starting from the bottom of the shared google sheet.

• rocsg
• benjaminbolling
• edeno
• ranzhengcode
• yidan-yang
• imciner2
• ziyiyin97
• lukaszjablonski
• klb2
• max-little
• epspebble
• cherry6666
• jorgedch
• itismeghasyam
• Ykarpate

from joss-reviews.

👋 @jbytecode - would you be willing to edit this submission?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

@danielskatz - of course, gladly.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot assign me as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@kmkinnaird - thank you for providing a list of potential reviewers, that is very helpful indeed.

from joss-reviews.

👋👋👋 Dear @edeno and Dear @Rocsg 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "repytah: An Open-Source Python Package That Builds Aligned Hierarchies for Sequential Data Streams". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#5166).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

from joss-reviews.

Hello @jbytecode
I am ok with helping with this review. Let me know when you want to start.

Please also note that I could be less available in the last week of march.

Rocsg

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @Rocsg as reviewer

@Rocsg - That's okay. Thank you for accepting our invitation. Whenever we assign the second reviewers, the review will start in a separate thread.

from joss-reviews.

@Rocsg added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

👋👋👋 Dear @ranzhengcode 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "repytah: An Open-Source Python Package That Builds Aligned Hierarchies for Sequential Data Streams". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#5166).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

from joss-reviews.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @ranzhengcode as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@ranzhengcode added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@kmkinnaird - Thank you for submitting your paper to JOSS.

@Rocsg, @ranzhengcode - Thank you all for accepting our invitation.

The review will start in a new GitHub issue. I will introduce the requirements and instructions there.

See you there!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5213.

from joss-reviews.