Comments (40)
kyleniemeyer
commented on July 20, 2024
1
@editorialbot invite @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor
from joss-reviews.
frederickgosselin
commented on July 20, 2024
1
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the invitation. This is a bit besides my area of expertise. Perhaps my colleague Martin Levesque at Polytechnique Montréal or his former PhD student Elias Ghossein who now work at Maya HTT could be available. This is dead on their specialty.
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.20 s (380.8 files/s, 229841.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 8 3 51 22133
JavaScript 14 2420 2485 9106
HTML 16 543 48 4103
Python 10 291 619 879
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1795 788
CSS 5 187 39 759
TeX 1 22 0 270
Markdown 5 70 0 216
YAML 2 7 4 42
reStructuredText 10 35 66 40
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 78 3590 5115 38371
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Wordcount for paper.md is 889
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104307 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04389 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3153710 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-28983-6 is OK
- 10.1122/1.549945 is OK
- 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 is OK
- 10.1088/978-0-7503-1454-1ch26 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-6636(87)90005-6 is OK
- 10.5445/KSP/1000070061 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-46737-4 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.750050413 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 is OK
- 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00129-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104555 is OK
- 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00117-6 is OK
- 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6461940 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4029448 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.21236/ad0692481 may be a valid DOI for title: Effects of Environmental Factors on Composite Materials
INVALID DOIs
- None
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
Potential reviewer seem to be timokoch, shravantata, sthavishtha and mbagheri20, to name a few.
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot commands
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Hello @Extraweich, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot check references
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104307 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04389 is OK
- 10.1115/1.3153710 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-28983-6 is OK
- 10.1122/1.549945 is OK
- 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 is OK
- 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 is OK
- 10.21236/ad0692481 is OK
- 10.1088/978-0-7503-1454-1ch26 is OK
- 10.1016/0167-6636(87)90005-6 is OK
- 10.5445/KSP/1000070061 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-662-46737-4 is OK
- 10.1002/pc.750050413 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 is OK
- 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00129-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104555 is OK
- 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00117-6 is OK
- 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6461940 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4029448 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot check repository
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.22 s (348.8 files/s, 210427.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 8 3 51 22133
JavaScript 14 2420 2485 9106
HTML 16 544 48 4087
Python 10 291 617 879
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 1795 788
CSS 5 187 39 759
TeX 1 22 0 271
Markdown 5 70 0 216
YAML 2 7 4 42
reStructuredText 10 35 66 40
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 78 3591 5113 38356
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Wordcount for paper.md is 889
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
I think a better label would be "Track: 3 PE", since it is really more of an engineering / material science / material physics software.
from joss-reviews.
kyleniemeyer
commented on July 20, 2024
Hi @Extraweich, we made that track move, and @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman has volunteered to edit your submission. We'll use this issue to also find reviewers—any suggestions you have would be welcome.
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot assign me as editor
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor
from joss-reviews.
Extraweich
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Thanks a lot for your volunteering!
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@JulianKarlBauer you are a code contributor for this work but not listed as an author. @Extraweich it may be okay to exclude certain contributors as authors, but I am just raising this here in case this is by mistake or in case the contributor in questions feels co-authorship would be appropriate. Can you confirm the author set of the paper is accurate/complete? Note, if you like, you may also consider acknowledging contributors in the paper's acknowledgement section.
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@nicoguaro, @likask, @lizarett, @nickelnine37, @frederickgosselin, @PolymerGuy, @fmatuschke
would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS? It concerns a "Python package for homogenization procedures in fiber reinforced polymers".
from joss-reviews.
likask
commented on July 20, 2024
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Happy to do this.
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot add @likask as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
@likask added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
nicoguaro
commented on July 20, 2024
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I can help with this.
from joss-reviews.
lizarett
commented on July 20, 2024
hello, this is a bit aside from my knowledge, but i can look. please, add me @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
from joss-reviews.
nickelnine37
commented on July 20, 2024
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, this looks interesting but it's also a little far outside of my area of expertise, so I will have to decline. Best wishes. Ed
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot add @nicoguaro as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
@nicoguaro added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@lizarett I'll add you an an
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot add @lizarett as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
@lizarett added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@editorialbot start review
from joss-reviews.
editorialbot
commented on July 20, 2024
OK, I've started the review over in #5295.
from joss-reviews.
JulianKarlBauer
commented on July 20, 2024
@JulianKarlBauer you are a code contributor for this work but not listed as an author. @Extraweich it may be okay to exclude certain contributors as authors, but I am just raising this here in case this is by mistake or in case the contributor in questions feels co-authorship would be appropriate. Can you confirm the author set of the paper is accurate/complete? Note, if you like, you may also consider acknowledging contributors in the paper's acknowledgement section.
Thank you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for raising this question. @Extraweich kindly contacted me beforehand and again after your remark. I only did a little bit of code clean-up and took the opportunity to compare some minor features which homopy shares with mechkit and mechmean. These comparisons actually made their way to the tests, which I am very happy about. However, I did not contribute to the actual new content within homopy nor the paper itself. Therefore, I think that co-authorship is not appropriate. Thank you again for raising the question :)
And thanks @Extraweich for making this great contribution and giving the opportunity for comparisons, this is very valuable.
from joss-reviews.
Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
commented on July 20, 2024
@JulianKarlBauer okay, thanks for getting back to us with this information.
from joss-reviews.
Related Issues (20)
- [PRE REVIEW]: 4DModeller: a spatio-temporal modelling package HOT 20
- [REVIEW]: Dolphin: A Python package for large-scale InSAR PS/DS processing HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: GLORY: a Python Package for Global Reservoir Water Yield and Cost Estimation HOT 11
- [PRE REVIEW]: DIFFICE-jax: Differentiable neural-network solver for data assimilation of ice shelves in JAX HOT 9
- [PRE REVIEW]: HyperCoast: A Python Package for Visualizing and Analyzing Hyperspectral Data in Coastal Environments HOT 15
- [PRE REVIEW]: startinpy: A Python library for modelling and processing 2.5D triangulated terrains HOT 16
- [PRE REVIEW]: biopixR: Extracting Insights from Biological Images HOT 14
- [PRE REVIEW]: Advances in training for data sonification: The sonoTrainings web platform HOT 10
- [REVIEW]: OpenMD: A parallel molecular dynamics engine for complex systems and interfaces HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: hoboR: An R package to summarize and manipulate weather station data HOT 11
- [PRE REVIEW]: modisfast: An R package for fast and efficient access to MODIS, VIIRS and GPM Earth Observation data HOT 28
- [PRE REVIEW]: LorenzCycleToolkit: A Comprehensive Python Tool for Analyzing Atmospheric Energy Cycles HOT 17
- [REVIEW]: spatPomp: An R package for spatiotemporal partially observed Markov process models HOT 7
- [REVIEW]: commensurability: a Python package for classifying astronomical orbits based on their toroid volume HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: TSE: A triple stellar evolution code HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: CompressedBeliefMDPs.jl: A Julia Package for Solving Large POMDPs with Belief Compression HOT 7
- [REVIEW]: universalmotif: An R package for biological motif analysis HOT 7
- [REVIEW]: MDCraft: A Python assistant for performing and analyzing molecular dynamics simulations of soft matter systems HOT 12
- [PRE REVIEW]: ngsPETSc: A coupling between NETGEN/NGSolve 2 and PETSc HOT 12
- [PRE REVIEW]: ProbNumDiffEq.jl: Probabilistic Numerical Solvers for Ordinary Differential Equations in Julia HOT 18
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from joss-reviews.