[PRE REVIEW]: PreliZ: A tool-box for prior elicitation about joss-reviews HOT 31 CLOSED

@aleicazatti - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

from joss-reviews.

👋 @aleicazatti – I'm delighted to say that @olexandr-konovalov has kindly agreed to edit this submission. He's a little busy for the next week or so but will be picking this up 🔜

from joss-reviews.

@olexandr-konovalov

Sorry, that is not my field of expertise and I find it difficult to review. I can therefore also not suggest someone from my professional network.

from joss-reviews.

@djmannion @GregoryAshton - would one of you be able to review this submission for JOSS, please?

Sure, I'd be happy to review it.

from joss-reviews.

@djmannion @GregoryAshton - would one of you be able to review this submission for JOSS, please?

If not, could you possibly recommend someone whom we may approach regarding this?

I am sorry, but at this time I can't commit to reviews. My apologies.

from joss-reviews.

@aleicazatti I have checked the latest article proof - before I will open the review for @djmannion and @jungtaekkim, would you be able to address some suggestions of mine, please?

• fix references (e.g. all of them in the "Statement of need" are not resolved)
• the reference to Morris et al. (page 2, line 46) does not have to be in quotes
• fix markdown (e.g. line 38 p.1) - instead of quotes, it should look like code in line 51, p.3
• same in line 44, page 2
• Fix figure captions (repeated word "Figure")
• check the use of punctuation and capitalisation in Acknowledgements

References:

• Fix the author of Ipywidgets reference.
• Also, add URL for their GitHub repository (is it https://github.com/jupyter-widgets/ipywidgets ?)
• Jupyter-matplotlib repository has a new URL: https://github.com/matplotlib/ipympl

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.09 s (602.0 files/s, 127522.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          28           1450           1866           4267
Markdown                         8             84              0            221
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           2690            144
TeX                              1             12              0            140
YAML                             4             14              2            115
TOML                             1              9              0             51
reStructuredText                 2             36             27             36
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              6              7             13
CSS                              1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            53           1619           4593           5016
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 820

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.01143 is OK
- 10.1007/s11104-022-05329-0 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.31219/osf.io/fcmun may be a valid DOI for title: Prior Setting in Practice: Strategies and Rationales Used in Choosing Prior Distributions for Bayesian Analysis

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.010 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@arfon - thank you for notifying us!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot assign @olexandr-konovalov as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @olexandr-konovalov is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

Thanks for the update, @arfon. And thanks @olexandr-konovalov for accepting to edit this submission. Very much appreciated!

from joss-reviews.

@lindemann09 @jungtaekkim - would one or both of you be able to review this submission for JOSS, please?

If not, could you possibly recommend someone whom we may approach regarding this?

from joss-reviews.

@olexandr-konovalov

I think I can review this paper. Please assign me as a reviewer.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @jungtaekkim as reviewer

@jungtaekkim thank you very much! I will start the review as soon as we will know another reviewer.

from joss-reviews.

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

from joss-reviews.

@djmannion @GregoryAshton - would one of you be able to review this submission for JOSS, please?

If not, could you possibly recommend someone whom we may approach regarding this?

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @jungtaekkim as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@jungtaekkim added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @djmannion as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@djmannion added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Thanks for updates @aleicazatti!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5499.

from joss-reviews.