Comments (57)
Hi - sorry for only getting back here now, this week has been busy! @henrikdvn thanks for suggesting reviewers! @oliviaguest I'll take this on then.
from joss-reviews.
@britta-wstnr, @oliviaguest: Compiles now. There was an issue with the metadata due to a last minute auto-indent.
from joss-reviews.
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.04 s (1623.5 files/s, 224682.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 13 819 748 3059
HTML 28 229 0 2194
PHP 20 276 284 852
Markdown 3 143 0 620
TeX 1 9 0 152
CSS 3 50 4 87
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 69 1527 1040 6982
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119241 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0260695 is OK
- 10.1111/desc.13193 is OK
- 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101649 is OK
- 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528 is OK
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01021 is OK
- 10.1002/acp.3569 is OK
- 10.1177/0894439319851503 is OK
- 10.3233/JAD-160545 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
from joss-reviews.
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1082
from joss-reviews.
@britta-wstnr do you have capacity for this? 😊
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
Hi - this seems to be a bit outside of my expertise, so I would like to read the paper first to get a better overview! 🙂
But it seems to not be compiling, @henrikdvn can you have a look at that?
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@henrikdvn can you try putting the paper at the top level in the repo? I think this causes the problem with generating the pdf?
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from joss-reviews.
@oliviaguest
Regarding reviewers: Would be interesting to hear what some of these think of my software:
lukaszjablonski, Milantex, abhishekvp, kinow
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot commands
from joss-reviews.
Hello @henrikdvn, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot check repository
from joss-reviews.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.05 s (1305.1 files/s, 180597.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 13 819 748 3059
HTML 28 229 0 2194
PHP 20 276 284 852
Markdown 3 143 0 619
TeX 1 9 0 152
CSS 3 50 4 87
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 69 1527 1040 6981
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1079
from joss-reviews.
@britta-wstnr: Sorry about the mess with the paper, but it compiles now. Don't know about the technical part, but I think the research significance may be within your field. Also found some reviewers on the list that I think should be able to review the software:
lukaszjablonski, Milantex, abhishekvp, kinow.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot invite @britta-wstnr as editor
from joss-reviews.
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot assign @britta-wstnr as editor
from joss-reviews.
Assigned! @britta-wstnr is now the editor
from joss-reviews.
To be transparent about the progress: I have reached out to reviewers via e-mail.
from joss-reviews.
@britta-wstnr Thanks. Is it ok to make minor changes at this stage? I sort of get blind for mistakes etc. when writing things and tend to discover them when I take a second look after a few day's break.
from joss-reviews.
You mean for the paper @henrikdvn ? That should be fine, go ahead!
from joss-reviews.
No success in inviting reviewers via e-mail so far, moving it here ...
from joss-reviews.
Hi @abhishekvp and @lukaszjablonski 👋
Would you be willing to review the submission:
CRSocket: A web app component facilitating the administration of digital trials from a separate device
for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
The review concerns the software CRSocket and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.
You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.
If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.
Thank you!
Britta
from joss-reviews.
Thank you @britta-wstnr. Yes, sure. I'm happy to review it.
from joss-reviews.
Great, @lukaszjablonski, I appreciate it! 🙏
The reviewing process will start once I have found a sufficient number of reviewers, you will get pinged once we move forward.
from joss-reviews.
Ping @abhishekvp 👋
Kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) 🙏
from joss-reviews.
Would you be willing to review the submission:
CRSocket: A web app component facilitating the administration of digital trials from a separate device
for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?
The review concerns the software CRSocket and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.
You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.
If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.
Thank you!
Britta
from joss-reviews.
Hi @britta-wstnr, I'd be happy to review.
from joss-reviews.
Hi @rabdill - that's great, I appreciate it! 🙏
I'll start the reviewing process soon - you'll get pinged about it.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @rabdill as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
@rabdill added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @lukaszjablonski as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
@lukaszjablonski added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
Hi @lukaszjablonski and @rabdill ,
hi @henrikdvn,
let's move this submission to the reviewing step 🌱 . That means that this PRE-REVIEW will be closed and you will be pinged in a new thread - there'll be detailed info how to proceed there!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot start review
from joss-reviews.
OK, I've started the review over in #5658.
from joss-reviews.
Related Issues (20)
- [REVIEW]: Fundus Image Toolbox: A Python package for fundus image processing HOT 12
- [REVIEW]: TSE: A triple stellar evolution code HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: bursty_dynamics: A Python package for exploring the temporal properties of longitudinal data HOT 9
- [REVIEW]: EPyT-Flow: A Toolkit for Generating Water Distribution Network Data HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: pycellga: A Python package for improved cellular genetic algorithms HOT 16
- [PRE REVIEW]: constrained_manipulability: A ROS 2 library to Compute and Visualize Constrained Capacities for Robotic Manipulators HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: robot_collision_checking: A Lightweight ROS 2 Interface to FCL (Flexible Collision Library) HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: MathematicaStan, a Mathematica package to interact with Stan HOT 12
- [PRE REVIEW]: Parallel LSH Ontology Matching HOT 10
- [REVIEW]: MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco HOT 11
- [REVIEW]: CoastalLens: A MATLAB UAV Video Stabilization and Rectification Framework HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: bayes_spec: A Bayesian Spectral Line Modeling Framework for Astrophysics HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: ler : LVK (LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration) event (compact-binary mergers) rate calculator and simulator HOT 6
- [PRE REVIEW]: Bayesian model reconstruction based on spectral line observations with pomme HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: BART-Survival: A Bayesian machine learning approach to survival analyses in Python HOT 13
- [PRE REVIEW]: Analix: an external agent detection software based on magnetoelastic sensors HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: Space-time formulation, discretization, and computational performance studies for phase-field fracture optimal control problems: reproduction code HOT 12
- [REVIEW]: seismolab: A Python package for analyzing space-based observations of variable stars HOT 7
- [REVIEW]: PYLIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count in Python HOT 6
- [REVIEW]: colorspace: A Python Toolbox for Manipulating and Assessing Colors and Palettes HOT 7
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from joss-reviews.