[PRE REVIEW]: mpl-interactions: A Python package for Interactive Matplotlib Figures about joss-reviews HOT 24 CLOSED

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (552.4 files/s, 397849.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             5              0              0          48403
Python                          24            677           1437           2905
Jupyter Notebook                26              0           4314           1513
Markdown                        14            254              0            549
YAML                             8             27              7            204
INI                              1              6              0             70
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
TOML                             1              5              0             25
TeX                              1              1              0             20
make                             1              6              7             15
CSS                              1              1              2              9
HTML                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            84            985           5768          53740
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 1322

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

@ianhi - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @ppxasjsm as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @ppxasjsm is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

:wave @ianhi, I'll be your editor for this submission. It would be great if you could help me identify potential reviewers, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. I will also be away Tue-Fri next week, so will likely only get properly started with contacting reviewers the first week of July.

from joss-reviews.

👋 @ianhi, if you could help with any reviewer suggestions that would be massively appreciated, thanks!

from joss-reviews.

Hi @ppxasjsm I'm sorry for the delay! I missed the initial message through a combination of attending a wedding and the subsequent holiday in the U.S. I'm now back and should be able to see messages much more promptly.

I spent some time searching the reviewer list and came up with the following as start. Happy to suggest more if need be.

flekschas - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2632
rgerum - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1336
paxtonfitzpatrick - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2369
arjunsavel - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1410
a-slide - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/138
jkanche - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/518
jonatanalvelid - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1803
desilinguist - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/3
jochym - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/54
rmhogervorst - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/139
ranzhengcode - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2388

from joss-reviews.

@ianhi thank you for your suggestions!

from joss-reviews.

Hi @flekschas, would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

from joss-reviews.

Hi @rgerum, would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

from joss-reviews.

Yes I can review this paper.

from joss-reviews.

@ppxasjsm I'm happy to review the submission but I might not get to it in the next two weeks as I am out for a conference and then on vacation. If that's okay with you I can likely get it done by some time in the week of July 24-28.

from joss-reviews.

Thank you @flekschas, that's not a problem!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @flekschas as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@flekschas added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

Thank you @rgerum for agreeing to review this.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @rgerum as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@rgerum added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #5651.

from joss-reviews.