Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (30)

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (174.5 files/s, 118608.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          10            882           1853           6279
Markdown                         2            112              0            186
TeX                              1             19              0            162
YAML                             1              1              5             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14           1014           1858           6646
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Wordcount for paper.md is 4728

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Failed to discover a valid open source license

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.22201/ia.14052059p.2022.54.10 may be a valid DOI for title: A Sonification of the zCOSMOS Galaxy Dataset
- 10.4018/978-1-5225-8539-8.ch002 may be a valid DOI for title: Strategies and technology aids for teaching science to blind and visually impaired students
- 10.21785/icad2021.031 may be a valid DOI for title: SONIFICATION FIRST: THE ROLE OF ICAD IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF SONIFICATION-RELATED RESEARCH
- 10.1145/3136755.3136783 may be a valid DOI for title: Evaluation of psychoacoustic sound parameters for sonification
- 10.1051/epjconf/201920001013 may be a valid DOI for title: Evolving from xSonify: a new digital platform for sonorization
- 10.11648/j.ajaa.20210904.11 may be a valid DOI for title: A New Approach to Sonification of Astrophysical Data: The User Centred Design of SonoUno
- 10.1038/s41550-022-01721-z may be a valid DOI for title: Sonification and sound design for astronomy research, education and public engagement
- 10.22201/ia.14052059p.2022.54.01 may be a valid DOI for title: THE POWER OF LISTENING TO YOUR DATA: OPENING DOORS AND ENHANCING DISCOVERY USING SONIFICATION

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

arfon avatar arfon commented on July 20, 2024

@johicasado – many thanks for your submission to JOSS. A few housekeeping issues here:

  • Please move the LICENSE file to the top of the repository.
  • Please review the DOI suggestions from @editorialbot and add them to your BibTeX file if they look to be correct.

Also (a more major comment), please substantially shorten your paper. Our guideline is that JOSS papers should be up to 1000 words long, and yours is well over that. Additionally, there isn't a clear statement of need section that articulates the research need of this package (see our paper preparation guidelines for help here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain)

Finally, I'm going to trigger a scope review by the JOSS editorial team as it's not immediately clear to me whether this software is in scope for JOSS.

from joss-reviews.

arfon avatar arfon commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot query scope

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Submission flagged for editorial review.

from joss-reviews.

arfon avatar arfon commented on July 20, 2024

Note to editors, a large fraction of the code here is in the GUI-layer. See a more detailed breakdown of the Python code here:

arfon@Arfons-MBP ~/sonoUno-desktop/sonoUno (master)$ cloc data_export/
       2 text files.
       2 unique files.                              
       0 files ignored.

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.96  T=0.01 s (234.0 files/s, 26561.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           2             20             61            146
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             2             20             61            146
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arfon@Arfons-MBP ~/sonoUno-desktop/sonoUno (master)$ cloc data_import/
       2 text files.
       2 unique files.                              
       0 files ignored.

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.96  T=0.01 s (232.6 files/s, 32104.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           2             31            105            140
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             2             31            105            140
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arfon@Arfons-MBP ~/sonoUno-desktop/sonoUno (master)$ cloc data_transform/
       4 text files.
       4 unique files.                              
       0 files ignored.

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.96  T=0.01 s (433.2 files/s, 38877.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           4             55            160            144
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             4             55            160            144
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arfon@Arfons-MBP ~/sonoUno-desktop/sonoUno (master)$ cloc sound_module/
       2 text files.
       2 unique files.                              
       2 files ignored.

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.96  T=0.01 s (202.7 files/s, 32741.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           2             57             42            224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             2             57             42            224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arfon@Arfons-MBP ~/sonoUno-desktop/sonoUno (master)$ cloc gui/
       3 text files.
       3 unique files.                              
       0 files ignored.

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.96  T=0.04 s (71.2 files/s, 184074.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           3            714           1480           5566
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             3            714           1480           5566
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

from joss-reviews.

johicasado avatar johicasado commented on July 20, 2024

@johicasado – many thanks for your submission to JOSS. A few housekeeping issues here:

  • Please move the LICENSE file to the top of the repository.
  • Please review the DOI suggestions from @editorialbot and add them to your BibTeX file if they look to be correct.

Also (a more major comment), please substantially shorten your paper. Our guideline is that JOSS papers should be up to 1000 words long, and yours is well over that. Additionally, there isn't a clear statement of need section that articulates the research need of this package (see our paper preparation guidelines for help here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain)

Finally, I'm going to trigger a scope review by the JOSS editorial team as it's not immediately clear to me whether this software is in scope for JOSS.

Hello, thank you very much! I already update:

  • The LICENSE to the top of the repository
  • The DOIs, only two or three references don't present one because it is a thesis and webpages.

About the paper, I will work on it in a short time to accomplish the 1000 words, sorry about that.

from joss-reviews.

johicasado avatar johicasado commented on July 20, 2024

@arfon many thanks for your guidance, I already update the text, it is still over 1000 words, it has around 1700, but I change substantially the format and it has now a Statement of need and cases of use, I want to ask if I have to make it shorter or if it could be accepted with this new length.

I don't have any problem to make it shorter if it is needed. I will be waiting for any update. Thanks.

from joss-reviews.

johicasado avatar johicasado commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

arfon avatar arfon commented on July 20, 2024

@johicasado – thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot commands

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Hello @ivastar, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot assign @ivastar as editor

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

Assigned! @ivastar is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@johicasado I will be the editor for this submission. I will be looking for reviewers this week. Please let me know if you can recommend reviewers.

from joss-reviews.

johicasado avatar johicasado commented on July 20, 2024

Thank you very much Ivelina! I could recommend to Dr. Jeffrey Cooke (https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~jcooke/), Garry Foran (https://au.linkedin.com/in/garry-foran).

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot add @ceb8 as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

@ceb8 added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@johicasado a quick update: I have contacted a number of potential reviewer but have not been able to find a second one yet. Still actively looking. Thank you for your patience!

from joss-reviews.

johicasado avatar johicasado commented on July 20, 2024

@ivastar thank you very much!

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot add @james-trayford as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

@james-trayford added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

ivastar avatar ivastar commented on July 20, 2024

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

editorialbot avatar editorialbot commented on July 20, 2024

OK, I've started the review over in #5819.

from joss-reviews.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.