Comments (38)
@cudmore the board has decided this work may be in scope for JOSS. Hence I will proceed to find handling editor. Note though that we have a bit of a backlog and many editors are preoccupied with other submission. Therefore we may need to waitlist this work until an editor becomes available.
from joss-reviews.
@AoifeHughes well that is just fantabulous 🎉
from joss-reviews.
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.05 s (940.6 files/s, 85192.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 29 405 796 1379
Markdown 7 135 0 276
YAML 6 18 8 236
TeX 1 13 0 170
Jupyter Notebook 3 0 694 124
TOML 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 47 571 1498 2188
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.7717/peerj.453 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8025955 is OK
- 10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01386390 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr390 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01105-7 is OK
- 10.1109/ICPR.2000.903713 is OK
- 10.1016/0165-0270(93)90020-R is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
from joss-reviews.
Wordcount for paper.md
is 912
from joss-reviews.
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from joss-reviews.
@cudmore thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with the initial steps.
I had a quick look at the paper. For the moment could you please spell out USA
as United States of America
in your affiliations? Thanks.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot query scope
from joss-reviews.
Submission flagged for editorial review.
from joss-reviews.
@cudmore I have just flagged this submission for a scope review by the editorial board. This is because this submission appears relatively small in terms of lines of code and I could use some help from the board to check if this work conforms to our substantial scholarly effort criteria. This scope review usually takes about 2 weeks to complete.
from joss-reviews.
I'm sorry @cudmore, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot commands
from joss-reviews.
Hello @cudmore, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot check repository
from joss-reviews.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.04 s (1108.1 files/s, 100363.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 29 405 796 1379
Markdown 7 135 0 276
YAML 6 18 8 236
TeX 1 13 0 170
Jupyter Notebook 3 0 694 124
TOML 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 47 571 1498 2188
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
from joss-reviews.
Wordcount for paper.md
is 912
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot invite @AoifeHughes as editor
from joss-reviews.
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
from joss-reviews.
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, super happy to edit! This looks interesting!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot assign @AoifeHughes as editor
from joss-reviews.
Assigned! @AoifeHughes is now the editor
from joss-reviews.
Hi @cudmore, I'm just putting out some requests to reviewers today, please feel free to make some suggestions of potential reviewers from your own knowledge or by using https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org to help us proceed faster
from joss-reviews.
Hi @AoifeHughes and thanks for accepting to lead this review. One person you can reach out to for review might be github username haesleinhuepf
from joss-reviews.
I'm still waiting to hear from a few reviewers I've reached out to. Hopefully will hear soon!
from joss-reviews.
@haesleinhuepf Would you be interested in helping to review this paper, JOSS review guidelines can be found here. I'd also be happy to directly answer any questions on our processes if you've not come across the journal before.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @jingpengw as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
@jingpengw added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate my checklist
from joss-reviews.
Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue
from joss-reviews.
@haesleinhuepf Would you be interested in helping to review this paper
I'm happy to review this paper; but not in the next three weeks 🌞
from joss-reviews.
No worries! That would still be acceptable 😊
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @haesleinhuepf reviewer
from joss-reviews.
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @haesleinhuepf as reviewer
from joss-reviews.
@haesleinhuepf added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot start review
from joss-reviews.
OK, I've started the review over in #5871.
from joss-reviews.
Related Issues (20)
- [REVIEW]: Fundus Image Toolbox: A Python package for fundus image processing HOT 12
- [REVIEW]: TSE: A triple stellar evolution code HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: bursty_dynamics: A Python package for exploring the temporal properties of longitudinal data HOT 9
- [REVIEW]: EPyT-Flow: A Toolkit for Generating Water Distribution Network Data HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: pycellga: A Python package for improved cellular genetic algorithms HOT 16
- [PRE REVIEW]: constrained_manipulability: A ROS 2 library to Compute and Visualize Constrained Capacities for Robotic Manipulators HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: robot_collision_checking: A Lightweight ROS 2 Interface to FCL (Flexible Collision Library) HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: MathematicaStan, a Mathematica package to interact with Stan HOT 12
- [PRE REVIEW]: Parallel LSH Ontology Matching HOT 10
- [REVIEW]: MocoExtendProblem: Interface Between OpenSim and MATLAB for Rapidly Developing Direct Collocation Goals in Moco HOT 11
- [REVIEW]: CoastalLens: A MATLAB UAV Video Stabilization and Rectification Framework HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: bayes_spec: A Bayesian Spectral Line Modeling Framework for Astrophysics HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: ler : LVK (LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration) event (compact-binary mergers) rate calculator and simulator HOT 6
- [PRE REVIEW]: Bayesian model reconstruction based on spectral line observations with pomme HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: BART-Survival: A Bayesian machine learning approach to survival analyses in Python HOT 13
- [PRE REVIEW]: Analix: an external agent detection software based on magnetoelastic sensors HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: Space-time formulation, discretization, and computational performance studies for phase-field fracture optimal control problems: reproduction code HOT 12
- [REVIEW]: seismolab: A Python package for analyzing space-based observations of variable stars HOT 7
- [REVIEW]: PYLIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count in Python HOT 6
- [REVIEW]: colorspace: A Python Toolbox for Manipulating and Assessing Colors and Palettes HOT 7
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from joss-reviews.