Comments (48)
reviewers don't have to be from the list - that's just a source of possible reviewers...
from joss-reviews.
@danielskatz - Thank you very much for the explanation. I had already mentioned that we only need GitHub account names. The list keeps the information of those who want to review for JOSS, but of course, we can invite other GitHub accounts from outside as well.
from joss-reviews.
@danielskatz - Sure! At least one of the suggested people has a GitHub account, and I will try to invite them if we don't get a response from the ones we've already invited.
from joss-reviews.
@jbytecode
Sorry for the late reply.
If you are still looking for a reviewer, I can do that.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @baxmittens as reviewer
@baxmittens - Thank you for accepting our invitation, indeed it is not much late. I will inform you whenever we assign at least one more reviewer.
from joss-reviews.
Hello, sorry for the late reply! This looks like a very cool project and I would be happy to review if still needed.
from joss-reviews.
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108327 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101204 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108210 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03349 is OK
- 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v098.i16 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05161 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1108/JSFE-07-2016-0010 is OK
- 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.002 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1607.07892 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.06189 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A Review of Recent Features and Improvements Added...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Turing: A Language for Flexible Probabilistic Infe...
INVALID DOIs
- None
from joss-reviews.
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.08 s (1046.2 files/s, 117581.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 46 980 982 3280
SVG 3 0 0 1813
Markdown 22 446 0 1229
TeX 2 24 0 328
YAML 7 0 3 185
TOML 2 4 0 39
CSS 1 2 6 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 83 1456 991 6881
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
207 Damir Akchurin
15 CompatHelper Julia
14 AkchurinDA
2 dependabot[bot]
from joss-reviews.
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 990
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
from joss-reviews.
License info:
β
License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
from joss-reviews.
ππ Download article proof π View article proof on GitHub π π
from joss-reviews.
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
Copulas.jl: A fully Distributions.jl-compliant copula package
Submitting author: @lrnv
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @lucaferranti, @AnderGray
Similarity score: 0.7982
GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7789
GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7659
POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7448
GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7375
from joss-reviews.
π @jbytecode - I know you are at your editing limit, but this submission made me think of you π so I thought I would check and see if you wanted to take it; perhaps one of your current submissions are close to complete?
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor
from joss-reviews.
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
from joss-reviews.
Hi,
I would like to suggest the following potential reviewers for the paper based on their respective research domains listed here:
- baxmittens - uncertainty quantification
- rafaelorozco - uncertainty quantification
I would also be happy to provide a list of potential reviewers outside of that list.
Thank you.
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
@danielskatz sure!
from joss-reviews.
Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor
from joss-reviews.
πππ Dear @baxmittens, @rafaelorozco πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 25 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
@rafaelorozco - I know you have one more workload at JOSS, but I think you can sequentially handle them. Please tell me otherwise.
from joss-reviews.
Hi, @jbytecode,
Thanks for agreeing to be the editor!
I have a quick question: It is OK if I update the paper (fixed a few typos and improved the readability of a few sentences) before the reviewers get assigned?
from joss-reviews.
@AkchurinDA - Sure. Apply your changes and trig an @editorialbox generate pdf
command here. Could you please, if possible, provide some more potential reviewers in case we fail to get a response from the invited ones.
from joss-reviews.
Thanks, @jbytecode!
Sure, here is a list of 3 potential external reviewers who work in the field of structural and system reliability analysis and with whom I don't have any conflicts of interest:
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
ππ Download article proof π View article proof on GitHub π π
from joss-reviews.
@AkchurinDA - We need their GitHub handles to communicate with. Please provide GitHub usernames without using the @
character. You can use the search tool: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers
from joss-reviews.
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8069
GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7720
GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7634
POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7483
UncertainData.jl: a Julia package for working with measurements and datasets with uncertainties.
Submitting author: @kahaaga
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @dmbates, @ahwillia
Similarity score: 0.7290
from joss-reviews.
Oh, sorry, I think I misunderstood. These people are outside of the JOSS' list of reviewers and I don't know their GitHub handles.
I would propose the following potential reviewers from the list:
- dannys4 - uncertainty quantification, numerical methods
- ziyiyin97 - uncertainty quantification, numerical methods
- dmbates - statistics
- ahwillia - statistics
from joss-reviews.
Editors can also search for GitHub accounts of potential reviewers, or contact them via email, where they may either say that they have a GitHub account already or are willing to create one to do the review.
from joss-reviews.
Notes to everyone: I have sent an invitation email to Dr. Abbie B. Liel and Dr. Jared DeBock.
Dr. Brennan Bean had an easily accessible GitHub address, so I will send the invitation to them in the preview issue here.
from joss-reviews.
Dear Dr. Brennan Bean (@beanb2)
I'm writing to you because you have been suggested as a potential reviewer for a paper in JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software).
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia (#6931)
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
If you accept reviewing, you can post a message in the GitHub link #6931
Thank you in advance!
from joss-reviews.
from joss-reviews.
@beanb2 - I hope you quickly make positive progress in health matters, please letβs stay in touch. Thank you for the reply.
from joss-reviews.
@baxmittens added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
@beanb2 - Sorry to hear that, Dr. Bean. I hope your wife recovers as soon as possible. I will keep you in my thoughts.
from joss-reviews.
πππ Dear @dannys4 πππ
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:
[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 25 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot add @rafaelorozco as reviewer
@rafaelorozco - Thank you for accepting our invitation. I will wait a little bit to get a response from other invitations before starting the review in a separate thread.
from joss-reviews.
@rafaelorozco added to the reviewers list!
from joss-reviews.
Hi @baxmittens and @rafaelorozco,
Thank you for agreeing to serve as reviewers of the paper!
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
ππ Download article proof π View article proof on GitHub π π
from joss-reviews.
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8091
GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7734
GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7648
POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7498
GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7292
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot generate pdf
from joss-reviews.
ππ Download article proof π View article proof on GitHub π π
from joss-reviews.
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8095
GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7736
GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7649
POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7498
GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7294
from joss-reviews.
@editorialbot start review
from joss-reviews.
OK, I've started the review over in #6967.
from joss-reviews.
@AkchurinDA, @baxmittens and @rafaelorozco, the review start in page #6967
See you there.
from joss-reviews.
Related Issues (20)
- [PRE REVIEW]: Control software for the open-source Broadly Reconfigurable and Expandable Automation Device (BREAD) System HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: TurboFlow: Meanline Modelling of Turbomachinery HOT 9
- [PRE REVIEW]: DistrictGenerator: Generating Building-Specific Load Profiles for Residential Districts HOT 6
- [PRE REVIEW]: TreadJS: A JavaScript library for modeling and realtime simulation of automotive tires HOT 7
- [JOSS Review] Small typo in paper HOT 1
- [REVIEW]: Advanced Multi-Surface Navigation for Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) Using 4D Path Planning Techniques (ugv_nav4d) HOT 14
- [REVIEW]: solartoolbox: A Python package for spatial solar1 energy analyses HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: Kalamari: A Representative Set of Genomes of Public Health Concern HOT 13
- [PRE REVIEW]: A Python Library for Pre- and Post-Processing of DAMASK Simulations HOT 9
- [PRE REVIEW]: ggrain - a ggplot2 extension for raincloud plots HOT 9
- [PRE REVIEW]: AdOpT-NET0: A technology-focused Python package for the optimization of multi-energy systems HOT 8
- [PRE REVIEW]: solids4foam-v2.1: A toolbox for performing solid mechanics and fluid-solid interaction simulations in OpenFOAM HOT 11
- [PRE REVIEW]: PhaseFieldX: An Open-Source Framework for Advanced Phase-Field Simulations HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: Bodge: Python package for efficient tight-binding modeling of superconducting nanostructures HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: openBURST: Real-time air surveillance simulation and analysis for active and passive sensors HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: dlr.esy.grid.match: A Grid Matching & Conversion Tool HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: WeibullR.plotly: Interactive Weibull Probability Plots HOT 11
- [PRE REVIEW]: FaaSr: R Package for Function-as-a-Service Cloud Computing HOT 14
- [PRE REVIEW]: 4DModeller: a spatio-temporal modelling package HOT 13
- [REVIEW]: Dolphin: A Python package for large-scale InSAR PS/DS processing HOT 7
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
π Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. πππ
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google β€οΈ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from joss-reviews.