[PRE REVIEW]: stl2sdf: Parallel scalable signed-distance-field generator for arbitrary cartesian grids about joss-reviews HOT 15 CLOSED

@AkshayPatil1994 due to the small size, we will perform a scope check first. I will pass along your comments about the usefulness despite the small size.

from joss-reviews.

Hello @AkshayPatil1994, unfortunately, the JOSS editorial board has found that this submission does not meet our requirements for substantial scholarly effort due to its small size. This is not a comment about its usefulness, and we recommend that you consider other routes to making your software citeable, such as following GitHub's guide on creating a permanent archive and DOI.

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.07.034 may be a valid DOI for title: A FFT-based finite-difference solver for massively...
- 10.1029/2020ms002141 may be a valid DOI for title: Inclusion of Building-Resolving Capabilities Into ...
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.10.035 may be a valid DOI for title: An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy si...

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (1197.2 files/s, 81479.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           7             24            314            408
Markdown                         6             75              0            213
Bourne Shell                     2              0             18             37
YAML                             1              6              0             31
TeX                              1              2              0             29
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            17            107            332            718
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

     4	Akshay Patil
     2	github-actions

from joss-reviews.

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 729

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

from joss-reviews.

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DTCC Builder: A mesh generator for automatic, efficient, and robust mesh generation for large-scale city modeling and simulation
Submitting author: @anderslogg
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @ifthompson, @ipadjen
Similarity score: 0.7466

FlowSieve: A Coarse-Graining Utility for Geophysical Flows on the Sphere
Submitting author: @bastorer
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @NoraLoose, @ashwinvis
Similarity score: 0.7373

PyGDH: Python Grid Discretization Helper
Submitting author: @kfhiga
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @JamieJQuinn, @zhaowei0566
Similarity score: 0.7367

NIMPHS: Numerous Instruments to Manipulate and Post-process Hydraulic Simulations
Submitting author: @Failxxx
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @vbassn, @liberostelios
Similarity score: 0.7361

BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.7330

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

from joss-reviews.

Here is a list of potential reviewers that might fit well

bbrelje
zbeekman
ctdegroot
esclapez

Hope this helps and looking forward to the review comments!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot query scope

from joss-reviews.

Submission flagged for editorial review.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot reject

from joss-reviews.

Paper rejected.

from joss-reviews.

Thanks, @kyleniemeyer , for your update; I understand that this does not fit the scope of the journal. Nevertheless, thanks for taking the time to review the submission.

from joss-reviews.