[PRE REVIEW]: WhaleConnect: A General-Purpose, Cross-Platform Network Communication Application about joss-reviews HOT 25 CLOSED

@editorialbot invite @mahfuz05062 as editor

from joss-reviews.

Sure, I'd be happy to review the article.

from joss-reviews.

Yep I’d be happy to

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3389/friot.2022.1073780 is OK
- 10.1186/s40537-019-0268-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Coroutines (C++20)

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (2744.8 files/s, 208543.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             50           1131            552           3642
C/C++ Header                    49            553            414           1483
Swift                            4            112             36            499
Markdown                        10            249              0            490
YAML                            13             95             10            485
Lua                              6             64             24            287
Python                           3             50             37            157
TeX                              1              2              0             28
XML                              1              0              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           137           2256           1073           7080
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  1092	Aidan Sun
    33	AidanSun05

from joss-reviews.

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 577

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

from joss-reviews.

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

BoboCEP: a Fault-Tolerant Complex Event Processing Engine for Edge Computing in Internet of Things
Submitting author: @r3w0p
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @abhishektiwari, @mahsan321
Similarity score: 0.6589

Spectral Connectivity: a python package for computing multitaper spectral estimates and frequency-domain brain connectivity measures on the CPU and GPU
Submitting author: @edeno
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @AJQuinn, @sappelhoff, @EtienneCmb
Similarity score: 0.6476

OPSDN: an enhanced SDN simulation framework for OPNET Modeler
Submitting author: @ZacharyJia
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @Qingfengmufeng, @pradeeban
Similarity score: 0.6387

CHAMP is a HPC Access and Metadata Portal
Submitting author: @cc-a
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @thurber, @acrlakshman
Similarity score: 0.6330

OpenMSIStream: A Python package for facilitating integration of streaming data in diverse laboratory environments
Submitting author: @eminizer
Handling editor: @pibion (Retired)
Reviewers: @lucask07, @SergeyYakubov
Similarity score: 0.6325

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

from joss-reviews.

👋 @mahfuz05062 - given that one of your other editing submissions is just about to be accepted, I wonder if you can take this one as your next?

from joss-reviews.

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

from joss-reviews.

👋 @mahfuz05062 - given that one of your other editing submissions is just about to be accepted, I wonder if you can take this one as your next?

Sure, I would be happy to!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot assign @mahfuz05062 as editor

from joss-reviews.

Assigned! @mahfuz05062 is now the editor

from joss-reviews.

Hi, @AidanSun05 do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here (without tagging them with an @). You can search the the list of people who have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

from joss-reviews.

Hello @mahfuz05062, thank you for your response. From the list, I think wob86 and harshadjs could be potential reviewers.

from joss-reviews.

Hi, @harshadjs and @wob86, do any of you interested in reviewing this article? Thanks!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @harshadjs as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@harshadjs added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot add @wob86 as reviewer

from joss-reviews.

@wob86 added to the reviewers list!

from joss-reviews.

Thank you @wob86 and @harshadjs. As two reviewers agreed to perform the peer-review, I will start the review process now!

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from joss-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #6964.

from joss-reviews.