Separate tutorial from application codebase about nodegoat HOT 10 CLOSED

I also think it's a good option to separate the code from the tutorial. But it's not a big matter for me any of the two options. I like the tutorials, but I also like the gitbook that @ckarande showed me in the past. The content is the same.

But we need to take a decision to keep pushing :).

from nodegoat.

Or even a "doc" folder using Markdown could be enough for now. I think from there we can achieve both these formats.

from nodegoat.

Is this done @ckarande ?

from nodegoat.

I think @ckarande has almost finished the migration to gitbook, any new about it?

from nodegoat.

@jesusprubio, @binarymist sorry for the delay in response. I was half way through migration, and other priorities halted it. I would need to pick it up. Any contributions are welcome.

from nodegoat.

So does this mean the existing complete tutorials are being deprecated in favour of gitbook?

from nodegoat.

I wanted to keep the routes and templates for the doc separate it from the vulnerable app. The gitbook is the most promising option. Would you preserve to keep the existing doc links?

from nodegoat.

I don't think changing the links will affect me. It's just that the current tutorials look good and seem to be quite functional, so I was just wondering why we needed the change. I'm not really precious either way though. Separating out a little more seems good, but as long as it's still close to the code.

from nodegoat.

Haven't seen much movement here. Is there anything I can do to help? I am the strange kind of developer that loves to write documentation. I'd be glad to contribute to an upgrade.

from nodegoat.

@jboyer2012 thanks for offering to help on documentation. Due to ease on update and convenience to read while working on the app, we are keeping the in app documentation as is for now. I will close this issue, but reach out to you while doing updates in future.

from nodegoat.