passive mode full internet access for router users about swiftp HOT 1 OPEN

2. Clients tend to deal with that by dropping back to using the control connection IP. I've not seen any actual issue from returning the wrong IP for clients using PASV through the router. Its possible some client out there won't.

I have router use with plain and TLS working right now and only 1 is necessary for IPv4 as the port range is too great for good port forwarding use.

IPv6 global address though needs to be restricted to ports of >= 5 digits in my case.

Edit:

Will have 1. included with an upcoming pull request for TLS since I need to deal with everything anyway (local, remote aka pasv internet access to router, ports, etc) and currently have it implemented and working there anyway.

I still don't see any reason to do 2. as all clients tested - including newly working ones - are not showing any problem with this even though its the expected thing... since I don't see a problem, I'm not spending time on it. (Someone else can if they see a need.)

Can't figure out what 3 is in reference to but not seeing any other problems here to connecting through a router.

from swiftp.