Unexpected numerical result, large difference between matrix and clifford method about clifford HOT 3 CLOSED

I get the correct answer when I compute this instead:
R_theta * R_L * x * ~R_L * ~R_theta
In retrospect, I was thinking about the direction of the transformation incorrectly.

However, now it looks like the matrix form is giving the unexpected result (it is the transpose of what I would expect) given the rotor order that I gave it.

Perhaps the documentation on how to compute the equivalent matrix transformation is computing the Transpose of what it should be doing?

from clifford.

Reopening issue because the Matrix equivalence documentation seems suspect (returning the transpose of the right answer)

from clifford.

I think you're right, this is a documentation mistake. I've opened #417, which transposes the matrix in the example.

from clifford.