Line comments about vrplib HOT 4 CLOSED

OK, that we can do! Let's choose # as line comment syntax. Will you make a PR for this? This function needs to be modified to ignore the comments:

https://github.com/leonlan/VRPLIB/blob/c504de49176125fe523b6f2d931eac62eb0d2683/vrplib/parse/parse_utils.py#L4-L8

It takes the instance text as a string. Lines that are empty when stripped or lines that start with # should be ignored. All other lines are returned as a list.

from vrplib.

(I'd not mind implementing this, but I think it needs a bit of discussion first)

from vrplib.

I think this is useful to have, but we need to think a bit more about the comment syntax.
Ideally, we use something that minimizes the impact of this change and is also future-proof.

For the case where we only allow comments on distinct lines, we have a lot more freedom, since it's not expected that any data or specification line will start with ;, # or //. But when we also want to handle the case where we ignore everything after the comment line syntax, we have to deal with many more variations. I can imagine that some instances use ; or # in the COMMENT specification. One issue with // is that it is used in URLs: for example, a COMMENT specification may include an URL to the web page that is hosting the instance.

Could you maybe provide an example on how you would like to use comments in the PyVRP test instances? If it suffices to have comments only on separate lines, then I think we should implement // as comment line syntax. But if you think it'd be really useful to have comments on "data" lines as well, then we might need to think a bit more about the syntax. Maybe triple forward slashes ///?

from vrplib.

I think just line comments are fine, I don't really see a need for comments at the end of data lines. So something like "every line that starts with a ; is a comment" could work.

from vrplib.