Come up with a different name about acorn-qml HOT 4 OPEN

Why doesn't EPL fit? We have it in a different repo anyway, don't we?

Btw. acorn-qml has copyright from QNX (Blackberry). So chances are good, that QNX needs and uses - and thus maintains - it, which would be very good for us, as it'd be less work for us ;) (Provided it's quality is good enough, of course)

from acorn-qml.

Why doesn't EPL fit? We have it in a different repo anyway, don't we?

Which one?

Btw. acorn-qml has copyright from QNX (Blackberry). So chances are good, that QNX needs and uses - and thus maintains - it, which would be very good for us, as it'd be less work for us ;) (Provided it's quality is good enough, of course)

Perhaps I should take a closer look, I saw that there was just one commit and did not look further.

from acorn-qml.

@akreuzkamp On a second look, https://github.com/Gaubee/acorn-qml is just a copy from https://github.com/eclipse/cdt/tree/master/qt/org.eclipse.cdt.qt.core/acorn-qml (which is a mirror of https://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/log/qt/org.eclipse.cdt.qt.core/acorn-qml) with some additional comments in Chinese and what looks to be some es7-related changes.

The original Eclipse acorn-qml looks to be maintained. Still not sure about the license.

from acorn-qml.

@akreuzkamp Created #2 for that, let's move that discussion there and keep this only for the name change in case if we would decide to roll our own.

from acorn-qml.