Doesn't support enqueueing a job with tags using ActiveJob about que HOT 7 OPEN

Hmm, I'm afraid not!

I'll have a quick look into how tags support could be added.

from que.

I've not used tags before, nor have I ever been clear on their purpose. Is there a reason you can't have your tags be a job kwarg?

from que.

We've dropped support for job options supplied as top-level keywords, but ActiveJob's QueAdapter still uses them. So we have to move them into the job_options hash ourselves.

I looked into this. The manual construction of job_options was only in edge Rails for 6 months (rails/rails#44734 until rails/rails#46005 / 2022-03-22 – 2022-09-13), with both merge commits showing a Git tag of v7.1.0.beta1, so given that, I read that it never made it into the v7.1.0 release. However, it was backported to 7-0-stable, and it's still present there, so I gathered that it was released in a v7.0.x, and yes, it was released in v7.0.4.

So. We can't just assume it's safe to change the handling of job_options in Que's ActiveJob extensions.

from que.

I've not used tags before, nor have I ever been clear on their purpose.

for example synchronization produces some amount of jobs. I mark them with tag and get synchronization progress.

Is there a reason you can't have your tags be a job kwarg

I think I can. It would just require some refactoring

Wanted your opinion before starting to refactor.
Thank you for a quick response 🙏

from que.

We could add tags as another top-level kwarg. It would be consistent to do that, given the other job_options are configured at that level - priority, queue, and run_at (although run_at is set via wait_until... or it was, but maybe that mapping's been lost now the Que adapter's been removed from ActiveJob... =S ). But that could be a breaking change for systems using Que that have a job kwarg called tags.

from que.

Another option that would allow you to keep using tags would be to insert that job using Que.enqueue. To keep compatibility with ActiveJob, just ensure you're doing it such that the resulting row inserted into the que_jobs table is the same as it would've been if it were enqueued using ActiveJob (other than the tags).

from que.

I'm going to reopen and rename the issue so it can remain tracked

from que.