Is `return` a keyword? about ccoscope HOT 1 CLOSED

I would say quite the contrary - I believe break and continue statements should have their own subclasses in the AST. The KeywordAST is a bit confusing, because it is meant to serve only one-keyword-statement-expressions. Note that for or fun are also keywords, but not keywords in the sense of KeywordAST. Which is a processed and codegenned as a switch(keyword) anyway.

This really boils down to where we want to draw the line between the AST and it's content layout.

Maybe a reasonable compromise would be to rename KeywordAST to LoopControlStatementAST, and leave return as it is.

from ccoscope.