0.55.0: Static Over Final Class warning occurs on overridable class property about swiftlint HOT 10 CLOSED

Ah, thanks for that clarification Danny. If I replace override class var with override static var then everything compiles and SwiftLint does not show a violation warning. I believe I have a better understanding now of what the rule tries to accomplish.

Hopefully this GitHub issue will help others better understand as well!

from swiftlint.

TIL: static is an alias for final class: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29206635/255489

This is one aspect of the rule. They are both equivalent, so the rule suggests to prefer the shorter one. In final classes, final is implicitly applied to all contained declarations, thus every class becomes final class.

Is there any functional difference between a class method and a static method on a final class?

I don't think there is, at least not in Swift. Perhaps there are both class and static in Swift because of backwards compatibility with Objective-C. But this is not my competence.

Anyway, due to having two keywords, the prescribed meaning for class is "can be overridden" as opposed to static which cannot. However, together with final, nothing can actually be overridden, hence the suggestion to use static instead.

Incidentally, the Swift compiler complains about open being used in final classes or declarations likewise.

My suggestions are "Prefer static over final class" on f in

class C1 {
  final class func f() {}
}

and "Prefer static over class in a final class" on f in

final class C2 {
  class func f() {}
}

Does that make things clearer?

from swiftlint.

I'm seeing the same in my project, in other NSObject-derived classes.

from swiftlint.

The intention of the "non-overridable" in the documentation is like "elements that cannot be overridden further should be marked static instead of final class".

In your example, static instead of class should be valid. Or are you seeing any compilation issues after the change?

from swiftlint.

Perhaps it's better to remove the part "for non-overridable declarations" from the message entirely. Anyone willing to do that? 😄

from swiftlint.

If I did, I would explicitly add this case to the static over final documentation for both triggering and non-triggering examples since it calls out Xcode boilerplate code that's bound to trigger a violation upon project creation.

However, my job prevents me from contributing to open source software so hopefully someone else can take the lead here 😅

from swiftlint.

Yeah, the wording of the warning here isn't clear. I took "non-overridable declarations" to mean methods that weren't overridden.

from swiftlint.

I still find the wording to be confusing:

SomeFile.swift:8:5: error: Static Over Final Class Violation: Prefer 'static' over 'final class' (static_over_final_class)

For this call site:

final class SomeClass: NSObject {
    @objc class func someFunc(...)

The confusing part is that the error message says "over final class", but it's not the final class part we're changing. We're changing class func to static func.

from swiftlint.

"Prefer static methods over class methods on final classes"?

For interest: I'm honestly unclear what the benefit is to this rule — is it just for consistency? (It would seem not, given that it's only catching final classes).

Is there any functional difference between a class method and a static method on a final class?

from swiftlint.

TIL: static is an alias for final class: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29206635/255489

This could be part of the confusion: I didn't know final class functions were a thing in Swift, so seeing that in the error message was confusing. Maybe leave it out if it was like the declaration I mentioned?

from swiftlint.