I would also welcome this feature.

from cloudfuse.

Like. Like. I would also welcome this feature.

from cloudfuse.

Waiting for this feature

from cloudfuse.

Hi
I just implemented this in my fork
Feel free to use it!

from cloudfuse.

I would really like this feature as well. I tried vfloz's fork and there is no documentation on how to mount an individual container.

from cloudfuse.

nevermind, i looked through vfloz's source code and found it. line 426 in https://github.com/vfloz/cloudfuse/blob/master/cloudfuse.c

container=

from cloudfuse.

Hi
I updated the README when I pushed the update
You can either specify container="your container" or pass the container="parameter" in the command line!

from cloudfuse.

@vfloz just so you know, i tested your code and it doesn't work. it had really odd behavior. I did a 'ls' once mounted and it listed the same file multiple times.

from cloudfuse.

I had no problem on my side. But I'll have a look at it.

[F v:lmart]

Le 2012-02-17 à 20:55, Jason [email protected] a écrit :

@vfloz just so you know, i tested your code and it doesn't work. it had really odd behavior. I did a 'ls' once mounted and it listed the same file multiple times.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

Just to give you more information, all of the folder structure was lost when I mounted using your version of cloudfuse. All 6100 of the items in the container where listed in the root folder.

from cloudfuse.

not permanently obviously... just where mounted. I'm using CentOS 5.6.

uname -a
Linux myhostname 2.6.18-274.18.1.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Feb 9 13:27:02 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

from cloudfuse.

Thanks, i'll have a look, you never had a chance to list all the content in the container?
Le 2012-02-17 à 21:28, Jason Barnett a écrit :

not permanently obviously... just where mounted. I'm using CentOS 5.6.

uname -a
Linux myhostname 2.6.18-274.18.1.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Feb 9 13:27:02 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

What do you mean?

from cloudfuse.

once mounted, nothing was showing with a #ls ?

Le 2012-02-17 à 21:32, Jason Barnett a écrit :

What do you mean?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

EVERYTHING showed up when i typed 'ls'

every single file at the root level showed up. there was no directory structure.

from cloudfuse.

What command did you passed?

[F v:lmart]

Le 2012-02-17 à 22:36, Jason [email protected] a écrit :

EVERYTHING showed up when i typed 'ls'

every single file at the root level showed up. there was no directory structure.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

I passed the ls command

ls

from cloudfuse.

I mean for mounting the container.

[F v:lmart]

Le 2012-02-27 à 10:14, Jason [email protected] a écrit :

I passed the ls command

ls

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

entry in fstab:

cloudfusecontainer /media/cloudfilescontainer fuse defaults,gid=156,umask=077,allow_other,use_snet=true,username=myusername,api_key=myapikey,container=main_site 0 0

Just so you know... I renamed the binary file cloudfilescontainer

from cloudfuse.

I did not test fstab integration, do you have the same behavior mounting it from command line?

[F v:lmart]

Le 2012-02-27 à 13:56, Jason [email protected] a écrit :

entry in fstab:

cloudfusecontainer /media/cloudfilescontainer fuse defaults,gid=156,umask=077,allow_other,use_snet=true,username=myusername,api_key=myapikey,container=main_site 0 0

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#11 (comment)

from cloudfuse.

Rsync has issues with the vfloz's fork of the cloud fuse. I tested with redbo's , it works except for preserve time option, but with vfloz's build , i can't seem to get rsync working. Any thoughts ?

from cloudfuse.

I need to check more on the rsync. I left this project a while ago asI didn't needed it that much. On my side it all seemed to work but the performance was really bad.

from cloudfuse.

This would be really useful to anyone that doesn't want to expose ALL containers. like me :-)

from cloudfuse.

Is this implemented yet? If not I would really much like this feature...

from cloudfuse.

Hey, sorry to comment on such an old issue. I was just wondering if Cloud Fuse ever implemented single container mounting with cloud fuse?

I am thinking it might be possible to setup a complex ACL equivalent for read/write access for Cloud Files using something like S/FTP. Which would achieve complex ACL without the need for API or RBAC.

Best wishes,
Adam

from cloudfuse.

Hello, I have the same request to mount only one container.

Regards
Guidtz

from cloudfuse.

7 years later, still waiting for this simple feature....

from cloudfuse.

@MrMoronIV if it’s so simple, why didn’t you get a crack at it? I’m genuinely curious.

from cloudfuse.

Isn't this just using fuse subdir? Or am I misunderstanding? -o module=subdir -o subdir=/container

from cloudfuse.