Make require statements work more seamlessly about solr-php-client HOT 2 CLOSED

On the one hand, I'm against this because it's not in the preferred style and 
standard of Zend Framework or 
PEAR. Libraries like this are intended to be on the include path so that 
through their Class naming 
conventions and file structures they can take advantage of the __autoload magic 
function for dependency 
injection.

On the other hand, I AM already doing require_once's to save the 10-20ms or so 
of overhead using 
__autoload since my Service class will directly use both other classes in most 
of its use cases. In addition I 
have fielded a number of email complaining about my "broken" requires.

So, for the sake of convenience to the user I'm willing to break with the 
preferred conventions. I'll commit a 
change shortly

Fixed in http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/source/detail?r=4