Title field not being exported about zotero-better-bibtex HOT 8 CLOSED

It seems to be affecting the location field as well.

from zotero-better-bibtex.

Sorry about that.

from zotero-better-bibtex.

No worries. I appreciate all the new features and the speed with which you
implement new features and fix bugs. I updated to v0.2.14 and the title
field now exports, but the problem persists with the location field.

Thanks!

Thomas

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:20 AM, friflaj [email protected] wrote:

Closed #35 https://github.com/friflaj/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/35via
a7b1a03a7b1a03
.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/35
.

from zotero-better-bibtex.

Are you sure you're using the BibLaTeX exporter, not the BibTeX?

from zotero-better-bibtex.

You're right. It does actually export the place field. It's just not getting picked up somewhere along my workflow:

I'm using the Zotero automatic export plugin (http://rokdd.de/b/zotero-autoexport) in combination with your plugin. I have configured the auto-exporter to use your Better BibLatex exporter. Finally, I direct pandoc to the exported biblatex file. So it might be pandoc or the csl that doesn't pick up the place field.

While debugging this issue in my workflow, I also looked at the biblatex documentation (http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf). It seems like biblatex types (books, proceedings, etc) expect a location field, and not a place field (see biblatex.pdf, pages 8-12). If I change place to location in an @book entry, the location displayed in the pandoc generated bibliography. Do you think it would make sense to map zotero's place field => biblatex's location field?

Thanks again for all of your efforts!
Thomas

from zotero-better-bibtex.

No, I was wrong; it exported the place field as "place" rather than
"location". There's a new update out.

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, treitmaier [email protected]:

You're right. It does actually export the place field. It's just not
getting picked up somewhere along my workflow:

I'm using the Zotero automatic export plugin (
http://rokdd.de/b/zotero-autoexport) in combination with your plugin. I
have configured the auto-exporter to use your Better BibLatex exporter.
Finally, I direct pandoc to the exported biblatex file. So it might be
pandoc or the csl that doesn't pick up the place field.

While debugging this issue in my workflow, I also looked at the biblatex
documentation (
http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf).
It seems like biblatex types (books, proceedings, etc) expect a locationfield, and not a
place field (see biblatex.pdf, pages 8-12). If I change place to locationin an
@book entry, the location displayed in the pandoc generated bibliography.
Do you think it would make sense to map zotero's place field =>
biblatex's location field?

Thanks again for all of your efforts!
Thomas

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/35#issuecomment-37797277
.

from zotero-better-bibtex.

The "place" being exported was a regression.

from zotero-better-bibtex.

If you're using Pandoc BTW, the plugin also includes an exporter that allows drag-and-drop citations in pandoc format.

from zotero-better-bibtex.