vis_miss sort_miss = F still changes the order about visdat HOT 3 CLOSED

Yup, I'll have a look at it this evening. I think that it is important the order of the columns matches what you see in the spreadsheet.

from visdat.

OK changed this with commit c7ba16e, and commit ae1355f.

This still means that the default behaviour of

vis_dat(df)

is to arrange the columns by type, but

vis_dat(df, order_type = FALSE)

will now get the same column order as in the dataframe.

Contrary to vis_dat, the default behaviour of

vis_miss(df)

will return the "normal" column order, and

vis_miss(df, sort_miss = TRUE)

Will order by missingness.

This means that the default behaviour of vis_miss and vis_dat are different to each other, which I don't like entirely, but I can fix that later

from visdat.

working well thanks mate!

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Nicholas Tierney [email protected]
wrote:

OK changed this with commit c7ba16e
c7ba16e,
and commit ae1355f
ae1355f#diff-e1e1d3d40573127e9ee0480caf1283d6
.

This still means that the default behaviour of

vis_dat(df)

is to arrange the columns by type, but

vis_dat(df, order_type = FALSE)

will now get the same column order as in the dataframe.

Contrary to vis_dat, the default behaviour of

vis_miss(df)

will return the "normal" column order, and

vis_miss(df, sort_miss = TRUE)

Will order by missingness.

This means that the default behaviour of vis_miss and vis_dat are
different to each other, which I don't like entirely, but I can fix that
later

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10 (comment).

from visdat.