Proposed Organization Chart about scikit-matter HOT 7 CLOSED

@ceriottm @Luthaf signal bump

from scikit-matter.

That looks good to me!

from scikit-matter.

from scikit-matter.

a few preliminary observations * perhaps we could have a "visualize" block that incorporates the chemiscope output as well as other utilities? * one thing that I'd be very keen to bring in here is the generalized convex hull construction. * should the normalize/center matrices go in preprocess/kernels?
…
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 09:41, Guillaume Fraux @.***> wrote: That looks good to me! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIREZ6DHIJNDHA5O734RX3SL7O2LANCNFSM4SZRURXA .

• I'd be good with a visualize block, would it include the plotting utilities? I wasn't sure if we wanted to move them here.
• I figured we might use the center/normalize a bunch, hence being in utils. It could also be warranted in post-processing
• Where would you want GCH?

from scikit-matter.

from scikit-matter.

I think having an analysis section may be a bit dangerous, as so much of what we do can be considered analysis

I'd more likely prefer to follow sklearn on this, where more one-off scripts are directly under the src directory alone.

from scikit-matter.

from scikit-matter.