Potential Problems in Convergence Criteria for Steady State about steadystatediffeq.jl HOT 7 CLOSED

Solved in #50

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

We'll keep this in mind. That tracking of the running mean could be a new callback and algorithm choice.

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

Thanks @ChrisRackauckas! The steady state solvers are a wonderful feature in Julia, so I'll look forward to seeing more about them in the future. Please let me know if you need me to kick the tires at any point.

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

Any contribution would be great since I don't see myself having the time for this any time soon, but wanted to at least have this around to consider having a future summer student look at psuedo-transient methods and more robust measures of steady state handing.

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

Sounds good - I'll probably continue playing with it since I have to deal with this problem in research so often. If I find a termination condition that I like and is not slower than just integrating to t --> inf, I'll update that test problem with a different callback and ping you. I will leave making it efficient to the professionals.

Good luck starting your semester!

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

Did you ever make a code for this?

from steadystatediffeq.jl.

@ChrisRackauckas let me review it again and get back to you in the next few weeks. I don't think I did anything with it after initially creating this test case. I ended up chasing down a few different issues, and I don't think I ever went back to the steady state solver.

from steadystatediffeq.jl.