Optional fields not supported about qtprotobuf HOT 6 OPEN

Sorry, all activities are temporary frozen, because of the migration to Qt6. I will try to cover this ASAP. :(

from qtprotobuf.

Just ran into this, any progress?

from qtprotobuf.

Hello,

have also encountered the problem described here and would like to add the following information. From version 3.12 and up to version 3.15 protoc still needs the addition of --experimental_allow_proto3_optional, which is unfortunately not supported with Qt6 using qt_add_protobuf.

Unable to execute /usr/bin/protoc:(1) xxx.proto: This file contains proto3 optional fields, but --experimental_allow_proto3_optional was not set.

A workaround here is to edit the file lib/cmake/Qt6ProtobufTools/Qt6ProtobufToolsMacros.cmake

    string(JOIN "\\$<SEMICOLON>" protoc_arguments
        "--plugin=protoc-gen-${generator}=${generator_file}"
        "--${generator}_out=${tmp_output_directory}"
        "--${generator}_opt=${generation_options_string}"
        "${proto_files_string}"
        "${proto_includes_string}"
        "--experimental_allow_proto3_optional"
    )

Following this, one comes very close to the problem described here, since the error message that now arises is identical.

Unable to execute /usr/bin/protoc:(1) xxx.proto: is a proto3 file that contains optional fields, but code generator protoc-gen-qtprotobufgen hasn't been updated to support optional fields in proto3. Please ask the owner of this code generator to support proto3 optional.

More information about supporting optional can be found in the protobuf repository and I would start by implementing the method uint64_t GetSupportedFeatures() const override in generatorbase.h

King regards

from qtprotobuf.

Hi, @glaubnichtalles the 'optional' fields support is planned for Qt6: QTBUG-103978

Unfortunately I don't plan any backporting from Qt6 to this repo because of complexity.

from qtprotobuf.

Hi, I can't open https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-103978 even after login. The problem does exist in Qt 6.5.1 and Qt 6.6.0 (beta).

from qtprotobuf.

Hi, thanks for the development regarding "Optional fields" support. My latest tests with Qt 6.6.0 beta 3 show that there are problems with the use of reserved c++ keywords. It would be great if for example the following entries could be added to the tests for the proto files:

optional bool private = 13; optional bool public = 42;

Kind reagrds

from qtprotobuf.