Maybe split gold standards to a separate project? about posteriordb HOT 7 CLOSED

from posteriordb.

Im not sure about this. The stan team (with paul as lead) is looking into a posteriors R package that is similar. We should build on that instead is my guess. But @paul-buerkner paul knows more about this.

from posteriordb.

Yes if we can build on it that would be ideal. Looking forward to hearing more about it.

from posteriordb.

@paul-buerkner can you give a short summary on what the posteriors R package is about?

from posteriordb.

From the current README:

The posterior R package will provide various tools for working with posterior distributions that are represented by draws.

Goals:

• provide efficient methods for converting between different representations of posterior draws
• provide summaries of posterior draws with names that can be adopted to standardize conventions in the bayesian R package world
  provide R implementations of the most useful MCMC diagnostics without depending on RStan

from posteriordb.

Thanks! Ah so I guess it's a public repo, can you link to it? I couldn't find it under either stan_dev or your user

from posteriordb.

Now, this is public. https://github.com/jgabry/posterior

So I close this issue.

from posteriordb.