Not fast as expected about firestorm HOT 2 CLOSED

@Lobo2008 Firestorm-0.2.0 will be released soon, a lot of improvements are included to get better performance, eg, shuffle data can be stored in memory and there is no necessary to wait all data flushed to storage. Also, some bugs about memory leak are fixed which will cause more GC. I prefer to use 0.2.0 with your case, if it still has big gap with your expectation, we can discuss it later.
For performance, if there has no disk IO random write/read problem, shuffle with Firestorm has poor performance.
We will also public the performance test with 0.2.0 soon for your reference.

from firestorm.

@Lobo2008 Firestorm-0.2.0 will be released soon, a lot of improvements are included to get better performance, eg, shuffle data can be stored in memory and there is no necessary to wait all data flushed to storage. Also, some bugs about memory leak are fixed which will cause more GC. I prefer to use 0.2.0 with your case, if it still has big gap with your expectation, we can discuss it later. For performance, if there has no disk IO random write/read problem, shuffle with Firestorm has poor performance. We will also public the performance test with 0.2.0 soon for your reference.

THANK YOU
I saw 0.2.0 has been released and I'll have a try later.

from firestorm.