footnotes and citations don't play nicely about learn_prompting HOT 7 OPEN

This is easily solved by marking the footnotes with a name instead of a number. For instance, on docs/applied_prompting/mc_tutorial.md, instead of marking the first note as [^1], mark as [^note], as on the following image:

from learn_prompting.

This is easily solved by marking the footnotes with a name instead of a number. For instance, on docs/applied_prompting/mc_tutorial.md, instead of marking the first note as [^1], mark as [^note], as on the following image:

This still seems undesirable. Additionally, where will that footnote appear WRT the citations. IMO it would be ideal to have all footnotes appear first and then citations at the bottom of the page. What are your thoughts on this?

from learn_prompting.

We are talking about this plugin, right? https://www.npmjs.com/package/@benchmark-urbanism/remark-bibtex

from learn_prompting.

We are talking about this plugin, right? https://www.npmjs.com/package/@benchmark-urbanism/remark-bibtex

Yes, it isn't very robust, so I forked it for what this site needed: https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex

from learn_prompting.

Ok. This plugin is deprecated, should we first try with this other https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation?

from learn_prompting.

@trigaten about my last comment, should I try firs with https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation or directly with https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex?

from learn_prompting.

@trigaten about my last comment, should I try firs with https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation or directly with https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex?

Preferably try https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex since I have already slightly edited it to the site's needs, but whatever you think is best!

from learn_prompting.