Relic variables? Snow melting energy in particular about vic HOT 6 OPEN

Ted - can you check what that variables is supposed to be. Seems to me this is mostly a matter of documentation - presuming the variable is meaningful.

from vic.

Not today. I have a lot on my plate today. I can look into it next week.
And by that, I mean I will check the immediate problem (what is going into
the melt energy variable). The task of going through all variables and
double-checking that they are what they are supposed to be will take much
longer.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:48 PM, bartnijssen [email protected]:

Ted - can you check what that variables is supposed to be. Seems to me
this is mostly a matter of documentation - presuming the variable is
meaningful.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/56#issuecomment-24840253
.

from vic.

I didn't mean that to sound as brusque as it did. I will look into this,
but in stages, as I have time.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Bohn [email protected] wrote:

Not today. I have a lot on my plate today. I can look into it next
week. And by that, I mean I will check the immediate problem (what is
going into the melt energy variable). The task of going through all
variables and double-checking that they are what they are supposed to be
will take much longer.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:48 PM, bartnijssen [email protected]:

Ted - can you check what that variables is supposed to be. Seems to me
this is mostly a matter of documentation - presuming the variable is
meaningful.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/56#issuecomment-24840253
.

from vic.

Sure - no problem - that's why I did not link it to a milestone and why it got the label "documentation" and "question" rather than "bug" or "hotfix"

On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Ted Bohn [email protected] wrote:

I didn't mean that to sound as brusque as it did. I will look into this,
but in stages, as I have time.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Bohn [email protected] wrote:

Not today. I have a lot on my plate today. I can look into it next
week. And by that, I mean I will check the immediate problem (what is
going into the melt energy variable). The task of going through all
variables and double-checking that they are what they are supposed to be
will take much longer.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:48 PM, bartnijssen [email protected]:

Ted - can you check what that variables is supposed to be. Seems to me
this is mostly a matter of documentation - presuming the variable is
meaningful.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/56#issuecomment-24840253
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from vic.

@tbohn : If you can provide a few words on what that variable is supposed to be that would be great. I don't want it to hold up release of version 5.0, so I am going to bump it down the road (but still would be nice to close it out).

from vic.

Why don't we link this to 5.1? I've been held up a bit here at ASU but I expect to resume development work on VIC (e.g., WRF Hydro driver, timeseries of LAI, a few other cleanup issues like removing redundant lake state variables, etc) starting in September.

from vic.