GFA output is not really GFA about vg HOT 2 CLOSED

GFA can express bidirected graphs, you just have to convert them to the
labeled-ends format. Edges that come to a node's start connect to the label
for its start, and edges that come to a node's end connect to the label for
its end.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Erik Garrison [email protected]
wrote:

It's come to my attention that vg is not outputting correct GFA format.

That said, it's not clear yet to me if GFA can support vg graphs as
@adamnovak https://github.com/adamnovak 's recent commits enable, as
such graphs have four kinds of edges.

Any suggestions about how to deal with this would be welcome. I think GFA
is a useful format as it enables text processing of graphs on the command
line.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60.

from vg.

I went through a period of confusion that's just ended thanks to the half
draft of the specification. Just need to resolve this in vg...
On Jul 25, 2015 12:02 AM, "adamnovak" [email protected] wrote:

GFA can express bidirected graphs, you just have to convert them to the
labeled-ends format. Edges that come to a node's start connect to the label
for its start, and edges that come to a node's end connect to the label for
its end.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Erik Garrison [email protected]
wrote:

It's come to my attention that vg is not outputting correct GFA format.

That said, it's not clear yet to me if GFA can support vg graphs as
@adamnovak https://github.com/adamnovak 's recent commits enable, as
such graphs have four kinds of edges.

Any suggestions about how to deal with this would be welcome. I think GFA
is a useful format as it enables text processing of graphs on the command
line.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60 (comment).

from vg.